48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE
Mole Valley District Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 5 October 2022
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Inspector
- Wilkinson H
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Biles & Company Estates Ltd
- Agent
- Biles & Company Estates Ltd
- LPA reference
- MO/2021/0184/PLA
- ONS LPA code
- E07000210
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 4 March 2022
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The development would appear cramped and incongruous within an otherwise spacious street scene, conflicting with local policies and the National Planning Policy Framework.
PDF text
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 31 August 2022 by H Wilkinson BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 5th October 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/C3620/W/21/3286603 48 Dowlans Road, Bookham KT23 4LE • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr D Absalom of Biles & Company Estates Ltd against the decision of Mole Valley District Council. • The application Ref MO/2021/0184/PLA, dated 2 February 2021, was refused by notice dated 14 May 2021. • The development proposed is erection of two detached four bedroom houses following demolition of the existing bungalow and garage. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. Reasons 3. The appeal property lies within a residential area characterised by a mix of house types, most of which occupy generous sized plots. The position of properties within their plots, the set back from the highway and abundance of soft landscaping creates a sense of spaciousness which positively contributes to the character and appearance of the area. 4.
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — Appeal Decision The plans show that the proposed dwellings would be sited 2.12 metres apart and within even closer proximity to their respective side boundary. By virtue of the positioning and loss of lateral space, the development would appear cramped. This would be further exacerbated by the vertical emphasis of the proposed building design. 5. My attention has been drawn to an annotated plan which indicates that the proposed plot width and distance between boundaries would be commensurate with a number of properties in the locality. Whilst it is acknowledged that some properties extend nearly the full width of their plots, by virtue of the open frontages of plots, varied building design, soft landscaping and visible side gaps, the overall sense of spaciousness along Dowlans Road is retained. 6. Specific mention is made of 27a and 29 Dowlans Road. Located on the opposite side of the road, these properties occupy wider plots and are set back a greater distance from the highway. Furthermore, whilst the separation distance between the properties would appear to be similar to the appeal proposal, the distance between the side elevation and boundary is greater whilst the building design https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/C3620/W/21/3286603 also has a horizontal emphasis and is therefore in keeping with the spaciousness of the area. The proposed development would therefore read as an obtrusive and incongruous form of development within an otherwise spacious street scene. 7. The supporting text to Policy ENV24 suggests that a distance of 2 metres between houses has historically proven insufficient on larger, estate developments resulting in cramped development. Nevertheless, the policy itself does not prescribe a minimum distance and instead requires proposals to have regard to the general space around buildings in the locality. As such, whilst mindful of Policy ENV24 and the appellant’s comments in this regard, the 2 metre separation distance as referenced within the supporting text has not been determinative in this appeal. 8. Although the appeal site is not located within a designated area or within proximity of a heritage asset, the Mole Valley Local Plan requires all development proposals to be respectful of local character and appearance, nonetheless. This therefore carries limited weight. 9. Accordingly, I conclude that the proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — Appeal Decision I therefore find that it conflicts with Policy CS14 of the Mole Valley Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2009, Policies ENV22, ENV23 and ENV24 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000 together with Policies BKEN2 and BKH2 of the Bookham Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016-2026. Amongst other aspects, these policies seek to ensure development proposals demonstrate good quality design and respect the character and appearance of the surrounding area. It would also fail to comply with the design objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). Other Matters 10. I acknowledge that the Council’s decision notice and delegated report raised no concern regarding the effect of the proposed development on highway safety or the neighbours’ living conditions. Whilst having regard to these points, they do not outweigh the harm identified above. 11. I am advised by the Council that the appeal site benefits from planning permission for the erection of a pair of 4 bedroom semi-detached dwellings with new vehicular crossover. The approved plans indicate a side gap of 2.6 metres whilst the central gap is omitted by virtue of the semi-detached design.
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — Appeal Decision Therefore, unlike the appeal proposal, the approved scheme provides a greater degree of lateral space which is consistent with the spacious character and appearance of the area. Planning Balance 12. The Council does not dispute the appellant’s assertion that it is unable to demonstrate a five-year housing supply and confirms within their evidence that there is currently a 2.9 year supply of housing. Paragraph 11 of the Framework, directs that where relevant policies are out of date, permission should be granted unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as whole. The proposed development would utilise previously developed land and be located in an area with good access to services and amenities whilst the development would also benefit the local economy. Nevertheless, the provision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/C3620/W/21/3286603 of one additional unit whilst contributing to housing supply, would make little meaningful difference to housing supply. Paragraph 130 of the Framework, amongst other aspects, seeks to ensure that development proposals are visually attractive and add to the overall quality of the area. It is considered that, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, the harm to the character and appearance of the area as articulated above would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits. Therefore the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply. Conclusion 13. For the reasons outlined above, having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other relevant material considerations, including the Framework, the appeal is dismissed.
48 Dowlans Road, Great Bookham, LEATHERHEAD, KT23 4LE — Mole Valley District Council — H Wilkinson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
Main issues and findings
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶3
The proposed dwellings would be sited 2.12 metres apart and within even closer proximity to their respective side boundary, creating a cramped appearance.
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶4
The vertical emphasis of the proposed building design would further exacerbate the cramped appearance.
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶5
The proposed plot width and distance between boundaries would be commensurate with some properties in the locality, but the overall sense of spaciousness along Dowlans Road would be lost.
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶6
The proposed development would appear obtrusive and incongruous within an otherwise spacious street scene.
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶7
The 2 metre separation distance between houses, as referenced in Policy ENV24, has not been determinative in this appeal.
Other Against appellant
The proposed development would conflict with Policy CS14 of the Mole Valley Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2009, Policies ENV22, ENV23 and ENV24 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000, together with Policies BKEN2 and BKH2 of the Bookham Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016-2026, and the design objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Other Against appellant
The proposed development would fail to comply with the design objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Living conditions Neutral ¶10
The Council's decision notice and delegated report raised no concern regarding the effect of the proposed development on highway safety or the neighbours' living conditions.
Living conditions Neutral ¶10
The harm identified above outweighs any potential benefits.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Policy CS14 of the Mole Valley Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2009, Policies ENV22, ENV23 and ENV24 of the Mo |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 5 October 2022 under the Open Government Licence.