62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG
Shropshire County Council — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Inspector
- Smith H
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- A J Rutter Limited
- Agent
- The Planning Group Ltd
- LPA reference
- 21/03296/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E06000051
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 6 January 2022
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed due to the proposal conflicting with the development plan, particularly in relation to the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The proposed dwellings would be too dominant and would not fit in with the existing buildings in the area.
PDF text
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 8 March 2022 by Helen Smith BSc (Hons) MSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: Monday 28 March 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/L3245/W/21/3285829 62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury SY3 7HG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr A Rutter (A J Rutter Limited) against the decision of Shropshire Council. • The application Ref 21/03296/FUL, dated 30 June 2021, was refused by notice dated 14 October 2021. • The development proposed is erection of 2 No 4 bedroom detached houses with on-site car parking following demolition of existing commercial premises. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. Reasons 3. The appeal site is located on Longden Road and is currently occupied by a commercial unit. Longden Road consists of mature residential properties with a mix of styles that are predominately two-storey. The rear of the site is adjacent to the Rad Brook Valley, which is characterised by sloping fields and pockets of woodland. 4.
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Appeal Decision The proposed dwellings would be set back further from the street frontage than the neighbouring dwellings, whose front elevations are all at a similar distance from the road itself. Whilst the existing commercial unit is also set back, the proposed dwellings would nonetheless be viewed in the context of the existing neighbouring dwellings. As a result of its positioning being further away from the street frontage, the proposed dwellings would appear as an incongruous feature within the street scene and would not maintain the uniform building line which characterises the area. 5. Furthermore, the scale, height and massing of the proposed dwellings would appear dominant and highly visible within the street scene. This is because the proposed three-storey dwellings would be taller than the adjacent neighbouring dwellings, with a roofline protruding above them. In addition, the proposal would be closer to the side boundary of 64 Longden Road, and therefore wider than the existing commercial unit. The proposal’s ridge height would also be set higher than the existing commercial unit which would result in the front elevations appearing more prominent than the existing building on site. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/L3245/W/21/3285829 6. The size and position of the proposal would appear cramped on site with very small separation distances between the two proposed dwellings and the neighbouring side boundaries. This would be of visual detriment to the street scene thereby causing unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area. The extent of the hardstanding driveway to the front of the proposed dwellings would add to this harm. 7. In addition, the depth of the proposed dwellings would extend further back into the site than the adjacent dwellings. Although the existing commercial property also extends further back into the site, its height is lower, and its width is narrower than the proposal before me. 8. I note that the ground level to the rear of the site changes quite dramatically as it slopes down towards the rear boundary. However, this is also true of the neighbours’ properties that have a building line closer to the street frontage. 9. Therefore, for the reasons given, I conclude that the proposed development would have an adverse effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Appeal Decision The proposal fails to accord with Policy CS6 of Shropshire Council’s Core Strategy (2011), which seeks to ensure development is appropriate in scale and mass and takes account of the local context and character. The proposal also fails to accord with Policy MD2 of Shropshire Council’s Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan (2015), which seeks to ensure development responds appropriately to the form and layout of existing development, including building heights, lines and scale. It would also fail to accord with the design objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework. Other Matters 10. The proposal would replace a commercial unit constructed of part brick/part industrial sheeting that generates vehicular movements within a residential area. However, this benefit would not outweigh the harm identified from the proposal to the character and appearance of the area. 11. The appellant claims that the siting of the proposed dwellings minimises the impact on the neighbouring properties side windows. However, I have found the proposal to be incongruous in appearance. During my site visit, I also observed that some of the neighbour’s side windows are obscure glazed. 12.
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Appeal Decision Although objections have not been received from the Town Council or the neighbours, the lack of objections is a neutral matter and certainly does not outweigh the harm that has been found. 13. The appellant claims that the proposal would make effective use of a brownfield site in an accessible location. However, this does not negate the conflict that has been identified with the development plan. 14. The site is adjacent to the Shrewsbury Conservation Area (CA). This was not a contentious matter for the Council and taking into account my observations on site, the proposed development would have a neutral effect on the setting of the CA. However, this neutral effect does not weigh in favour of the proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/L3245/W/21/3285829 Conclusion 15. The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole and there are no material considerations worthy of sufficient weight that would indicate a decision other than in accordance with it. The appeal should therefore be dismissed.
62 Longden Road, Shrewsbury, SY3 7HG — Shropshire County Council — Helen Smith INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3
Main issues and findings
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶4
The proposed dwellings would appear as an incongruous feature within the street scene and would not maintain the uniform building line which characterises the area. The proposed dwellings would be set back further from the street frontage than the neighbouring dwellings, which would make them appear more prominent.
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶5
The scale, height, and massing of the proposed dwellings would appear dominant and highly visible within the street scene, making them appear too large for the area.
Character and appearance Against appellant ¶6
The size and position of the proposal would appear cramped on site with very small separation distances between the two proposed dwellings and the neighbouring side boundaries, causing unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area.
Other Against appellant ¶10
The proposal would replace a commercial unit, but this benefit would not outweigh the harm identified from the proposal to the character and appearance of the area.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Policy CS6 of Shropshire Council’s Core Strategy (2011) |
Determinative |
| Policy MD2 of Shropshire Council’s Site Allocations and Management of Development (SAMDev) Plan (2015) |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 28 March 2022 under the Open Government Licence.