Case 3285597

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT

Stroud District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
13 May 2022
Authority
Stroud District Council
Inspector
Law T
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Change of use
Appellant
Vodafone Limited and Cornerstone
Agent
Galliford Try Communications
LPA reference
20/0388/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000082
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
21 January 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area, including the Cotswolds AONB. The inspector considered the harm to the area's landscape and scenic beauty to be substantial and long-lasting.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 22 March 2022 by Tamsin Law BSc MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13 May 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/C1625/W/21/3285597 Land at Lampern Wood, Lampern Wood, Dursley, Stroud, Gloucestershire GL11 5BT • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Vodafone Limited and Cornerstone against the decision of Stroud District Council. • The application Ref 20/0388/FUL, dated 19 February 2020, was refused by notice dated 26 April 2021. • The development proposed is the erection of a 25m lattice mast with antennas and dishes along with ground based cabinets and ancillary works. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2. The main issue are; • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB); and • The effect of the proposed development on ancient woodland and biodiversity. Reasons Character and Appearance 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision In accordance with paragraph 176 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in AONBs, which have the highest protection in relation to these issues. The scale and extend of development in AONBs should be limited. 4. Whilst the settlement of Uley is a short distance from the appeal site, its immediate locality is predominantly characterised by a band of woodland surrounded by agricultural fields. Built form is identified by the dispersed development of houses and farmsteads along Lampern Hill. The appeal site lies on an elevated piece of woodland within an undulating landscape, as such the site is prominent and visible from a number of views in the area. The site is also designated as ancient woodland and covered by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO). https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/C1625/W/21/3285597 5. The proposed development would be located within an area of woodland, however due to the need to have efficient transmission clear of clutter, the mast would project some 3 metres above the surrounding tree height. Additionally, a dish would be located a further 2 metres higher than the top of the mast. 6. The appellant has provided photomontages detailing the mast in its location on Lampern Hill. From some viewpoints the mast would be seen against the backdrop of the hill. Nevertheless, from much of the surrounding area, including from houses near Lampern Hill, the nearby settlement of Uley and from the surrounding public rights of way and highway network, the mast would be clearly visible protruding above the treeline. Notwithstanding the fact the mast would be painted green, it would still have an industrial appearance that would have a jarring presence above the more natural woodland. This intrusion would draw the eye, harmfully detracting from the attractive landscape and the prominence of Lampern Hill. Moreover, as many of the nearby trees are deciduous the impact of the mast would be exaggerated during winter months. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision The Council have raised no issues regarding the proposed ground based cabinets and ancillary works with regards to the character and appearance of the area. Given the size and close grouping of this equipment at the base of the mast and their location largely screened by surrounding woodland, they would have a negligible effect upon the area’s character and appearance. 8. Be that as it may, the proposed mast would be harmful for the reasons I have set out. It would adversely affect the character and appearance of the area and fail to conserve the landscape and scenic beauty of the Cotswolds AONB. 9. The proposal would therefore conflict with the Stroud District Local Plan (2015) (LP) Policies CP14 and ES7 which seek, amongst other things, to ensure that development respects its surrounding and is of a scale and location that is sympathetic and complements the landscape. The proposed development would also be contrary to paragraph 130 and 176 Framework that seeks to ensure developments are visually attractive and sympathetic to local character and is sensitively located and designed to avoid or minimise adverse impacts. Ancient Woodland and Biodiversity 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision The appeal site lies within an area of ancient woodland which is also a Key Wildlife Site. The proposed development would be located adjacent to an existing track in a clearing. One sycamore tree would be required to be felled to accommodate the proposal. The appellant has provided a preliminary ecological appraisal and arboricultural report as part of their submission. 11. Whilst the appeal site would only require the felling of one tree the Council are concerned regarding the impact of the proposal on ancient woodland soils and this priority habitat. The appellants submission details that there would be a small impact on the surrounding ancient woodland and proposed to plant additional trees and only undertake work during specified timeframes in order to not disturb or harm any nesting birds, reptiles or terrestrial mammals. The submission also details that a construction environmental management plan would be produced. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/C1625/W/21/3285597 12. Paragraph 180 of the Framework requires that development that results in the loss or deterioration of ancient woodland should be refused unless there are wholly acceptable reasons and a suitable compensation strategy exists. Overall the area of the proposed works would extend to some 25 square metres, which in terms of the ancient woodland surrounding the site is a small area. Whilst this would lead to loss of a small area of habitat, this could be mitigated and potentially enhanced via conditions relating to timings of work, tree planting, and management of the site during and after construction. However, as I am dismissing the appeal on other grounds I have not pursued this matter further. 13. The proposal, subject to conditions, would therefore comply LP Policies CP14 and ES6 which seek, amongst other things, to ensure developments contribute to the retention and enhancement of biodiversity interests. The proposed development would also be compliant with paragraph 180 of the Framework. Other Matters 14. The appellant has provided a reasonably comprehensive list of other sites that have been discounted for the proposed mast.

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision A number have been on the basis of a perceived adverse effect on conservation areas and listed buildings and some others for reasons of operational merit and finite user capacity. That said, and putting aside operational discounting, it remains the case that some of these sites have been discounted without an assessment by the Local Planning Authority. In any event, they would not be sufficient to make the harm I have found in regard to the siting of the appeal scheme acceptable on its own merits. Planning Balance 15. I have found that the proposed development would harm the character and appearance of the area including the Cotswolds AONB, a matter which attracts substantial weight. 16. Benefits of the proposed development include the economic, social, environmental and health benefits brought about by improved digital communications networks, site sharing between operators and the technical requirements for the mast. When these considerations are combined, they attract considerable weight in favour of the proposal.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Appeal Decision However, they would not outweigh the harm I have identified to the character and appearance of the area (in particular the AONB), which would be long lasting, detrimentally affecting landscape of the highest designation. Conclusion 17. There are no material considerations, including the approach of the Framework, and worthy of sufficient weight, that would indicate a decision otherwise in accordance with the development plan. It is for this reason that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Tamsin Law

Land at Lampern Wood, Dursley, GL11 5BT — Stroud District Council — Tamsin Law INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶3-8

The proposed mast would be visible from a number of viewpoints, and its industrial appearance would detract from the attractive landscape and the prominence of Lampern Hill.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶10-12

The proposed development would be located within an area of ancient woodland, which is also a Key Wildlife Site, and the felling of one tree would be required to accommodate the proposal.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 176, CP14, ES7, ES6
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 13 May 2022 under the Open Government Licence.