Case 3282704

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP

Wychavon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
20 June 2022
Authority
Wychavon District Council
Inspector
Aqbal M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Ltd
Agent
Dot Surveying Limited
LPA reference
21/01361/TC
ONS LPA code
E07000238
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
12 January 2022

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the significant harm the proposal would cause to the character and appearance of the area. The proposal would introduce a stark and incongruous feature within the street scene, detracting from the open and verdant setting of the area. The inspector considered that the site selection process was not sufficiently robust and that a less harmful location could not be found.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 18 May 2022 by M Aqbal BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 20th June 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/H1840/W/21/3282704 Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, Wychavon, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant approval required under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). • The appeal is made by CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Ltd against the decision of Wychavon District Council. • The application Ref 21/01361/TC, dated 26 May 2021, was refused by notice dated 22 July 2021.The development proposed is 5G telecoms installation: 18m high ‘slim line’ Phase 8 H3G street pole c/w wrap around cabinet and 3no. cabinets with ancillary works. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. For the purposes of my Decision, I have taken the full site address from the supplementary information submitted with the application. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision The provisions of the GPDO, under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A, Paragraph A.3(4) require the local planning authority to assess the proposed development solely on the basis of its siting and appearance, taking into account any representations received. My determination of this appeal has been made on the same basis. Also, I have only had regard to the development plan, related guidance and the National Planning Policy Framework (‘the Framework’) insofar as they are material to matters of siting and appearance. 4. The submitted drawings at appeal have been amended by removing transmission dishes that were originally proposed along the top part of the monopole. As this amendment reduces the extent of the development proposed and does not alter the nature of the proposal, I have therefore accepted the amended drawings in determining the appeal and I do not consider that the interests of any party have been prejudiced by my having done so. Main Issue 5.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, in the event that any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the location proposed and any benefits associated with the proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, in the event that any harm is identified, whether that harm would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the location proposed and any benefits associated with the proposal. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/H1840/W/21/3282704 Reasons 6. The appeal site is part of a grass verge along Defford Road at the side of the entrance to an estate road (Little Pennyrope) which serves a number of dwellings. 7. The surrounding area to the north of the site is predominantly residential in character, to the south of the site, with the exception of a few dwellings, this is largely countryside. 8. Due to the site’s location adjacent to the highway and footpath, and proximity to the junction, the appeal site is prominent in views from the public realm. 9. Most notably, the appeal site is free of any development and comprises mown grass set against the backdrop of the landscaped boundary of the adjacent property (1 Little Pennyrope) and beyond this is the gable wall of this property, which incorporates some brick detailing and a chimney feature. Therefore, the landscaped nature of the site and the detailing of the nearby dwelling positively contribute to the appearance of the appeal site. 10. Furthermore, a similar grass verge is located on the other side of the entrance to Little Pennyrope.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision Together, these grass verges provide an open and verdant entrance to the estate road and also complement the grass verges, landscaping and countryside on the opposite side of the highway. Notwithstanding that the site is not located in a designated area, for the above reasons these grass verges provide green spaces which enhance the character and appearance of the area. 11. The nearby area incorporates limited, small-scale street furniture, such as street signs. There are also few examples of vertical structures close by such as lamp posts and telegraph poles, which are slender in form and not particularly tall relative to the nearby buildings. Therefore, these elements are not visually obtrusive and are settled within the streetscene and do not detract from the verdant and open character and appearance of the site and area. 12. The proposed 18m monopole is to be sited adjacent to the highway and would incorporate a wrap-around cabinet at its base, along with further separate cabinets adjacent to this. The proposal is part of an integral requirement to expand Fifth Generation (5G) telecommunications network coverage for improving service within the residential area between Defford Road and Abbots Road, Worcestershire.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision 13. Nonetheless, in the abovementioned context, the proposed 18m monopole would not visually integrate with the nearby street lighting due to its appreciably greater height and column width and more bulky and visibly distinct headframe design in relation to the supporting column. It would also rise appreciably above the height of the dwelling behind it, appearing unduly visually prominent within the skyline. 14. Therefore, its siting and appearance would introduce a stark and incongruous feature within the street scene, which would unacceptably detract from the open and verdant setting of this area. 15. The position of the monopole and cabinets in proximity of the roadside would further contribute to the visual dominance of the proposal as perceived by https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/H1840/W/21/3282704 pedestrians using the footpath passing drivers, including those waiting at the junction and occupiers of the dwelling to the south of the site. 16. The appellant advises that the equipment could be finished in a colour of the Council’s choosing. However, I am not persuaded that the visual impact arising from the design, height and siting of the structure could be mitigated by the use of a particular colour finish. 17. For the above reasons, the proposal would result in significant unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area. 18. I have had regard to the South Worcestershire Development Plan (SWDP), insofar as this is relevant considerations within the terms of the GPDO. Accordingly, the proposal would conflict with the aims of Policy SWDP21 of the SWDP in that, amongst other things, all development will need to integrate effectively with its surroundings, in terms of form and function, and reinforce local distinctiveness. The proposal would also be contrary to the aims of SWDP25 of the SWDP in terms of safeguarding green spaces. Other considerations 19.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision Support for the delivery of advanced, high quality and reliable communications networks is afforded by the Framework, by other government documents and the development plan, and such networks bring significant social and economic benefits. Furthermore, the proposal would support new 5G coverage to a predominantly residential area. 20. The appellant also advises that the initial requirements was for 20m monopole which has been reduced. Also, as already stated the appeal scheme has been amended. Notwithstanding these factors, I have still found that the proposal would be harmful to the character and appearance of the area. 21. Paragraph 117 of the Framework outlines that for a new mast or base station, evidence that the applicant has explored the possibility of erecting antennas on an existing building, mast or other structure should be submitted. 22. According to the appellant’s submissions a sequential approach to site selection was undertaken, which included an initial desktop survey followed by a physical inspection of the area. The appellant advises that during this process, no mast/site sharing opportunities or existing buildings/structures were identified.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision However, Figure 1 of the appellant’s appeal statement shows the location of the intended cell/target area (white marker) relative to other sites within the wider locality. Nonetheless, from the information available it is unclear why some of those other sites in proximity of the intended cell/target area were not available for mast/site sharing. 23. Furthermore, although 4 discounted sites were considered, 2 of these are located considerably outside the intended target/search area. Taking account of the appellant’s contention that to achieve the operational requirements of 5G, the selected site should be within or as close to the intended target/search area as possible, and that only 4 options have been considered overall, the inclusion of these 2 sites outside the target/search area reduces the likelihood that the selection process has considered a sufficient range of potentially available alternative options. Furthermore, given that the proposed site is located beyond the intended target/search area, suggests that a greater range of potentially available alternative sites could also have been considered. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 10 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/H1840/W/21/3282704 24. For the above reasons, I am not persuaded that the site selection process was sufficiently robust and that a less harmful location could not be found. 25. Even if I were to accept the appellant’s evidence on alternative sites, this does not outweigh the significant harm arising from the proposal. 26. The fact that the proposal would meet the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines for public exposure is a requirement of prior approval and does not influence my findings on the main issue. Planning balance and conclusion 27. I acknowledge the potential economic and social benefits of the proposal detailed by the appellants, and the support given by the Framework in Paragraph 114 to advanced, high quality and reliable communications infrastructure, including 5G networks, in supporting economic growth and social well-being. 28.

Page 4 · Chunk 11 Appeal Decision

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — Appeal Decision However, in this case, for the reasons given above, I do not consider that the public benefits of the installation in terms of the enhancement of the telecommunications network, its contribution to economic growth and the locational needs of the appellants outweigh the significant harm that I have found arising from the proposal due to its siting and appearance. I, therefore, conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 4 · Chunk 12 M Aqbal

Area of Grass Verge Defford Road, Pershore, WYCHAVON, Worcestershire, WR10 1QP — Wychavon District Council — M Aqbal INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶14

The proposed monopole would not visually integrate with the nearby street lighting due to its appreciably greater height and column width, and more bulky and visibly distinct headframe design in relation to the supporting column.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶17

The proposal would result in significant unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area due to its siting and appearance.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶21

The appellant should have explored the possibility of erecting antennas on an existing building, mast or other structure before selecting the proposed site.

Planning obligations
Neutral
¶24

The site selection process was not sufficiently robust and that a less harmful location could not be found.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
SWDP21
Substantial
SWDP25
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 4 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 20 June 2022 under the Open Government Licence.