Case 3280702

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ

Thurrock Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
30 November 2022
Authority
Thurrock Borough Council
Inspector
Courtney T
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr G Pinkerton
Agent
Smart Planning
LPA reference
21/00243/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000034
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
13 January 2022

Summary AI

Costs application refused due to lack of evidence of unnecessary expense. Council's delay in providing Appeal Questionnaire and failure to submit Appeal Statement were not found to be unreasonable.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ — Thurrock Borough Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 29 March 2022 by Thomas Courtney BA(Hons) MA Decision by Chris Preston BA(Hons) BPl MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 30th November 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/M1595/W/21/3280702 Wick Place Cottage, Brentwood Road, Bulphan, RM14 3TJ • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr G. Pinkerton for a full award of costs against Thurrock Borough Council. • The appeal was against the refusal for the demolition of existing outbuildings, replacement of former smithy to create new dwelling and erection of new dwelling. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance advises that, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ — Thurrock Borough Council — Costs Decision It goes onto state that local planning authorities are at risk of an award of costs if they behave unreasonably in relation to procedural and substantive matters at the appeal. The applicant states that the Council were delayed in providing the Appeal questionnaire and did not submit an Appeal Statement to substantiate the reasons for refusal. According to the applicant, this amounts to unreasonable behaviour that could give rise to a procedural award and is also an example of unreasonable behaviour that could give rise to a substantive award. 4. Whilst there may have been a delay in providing the Appeal Questionnaire, the document was ultimately sent to the Planning Inspectorate and there is no evidence to support the contention that this delayed the issuing of a decision or that the Council did not engage appropriately with the applicant. Thus, whilst the Council clearly should have adhered to set timescales, the delay did not lead to any unnecessary cost. 5. Furthermore, I find that the Council exercised their planning judgement dutifully despite not providing an Appeal Statement to support their case.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ — Thurrock Borough Council — Costs Decision From the submissions, it is evident that the reasoning related to the proposed development has been clearly substantiated within the Officer Report. Local Planning Authorities are not obliged to submit an Appeal Statement as the reasons for refusal have already been substantiated at the application stage. The Council’s decision to not provide an Appeal Statement has not reduced the significance or adversely impacted the appeal process and eventual decision. I https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ — Thurrock Borough Council — Costs Decision From the submissions, it is evident that the reasoning related to the proposed development has been clearly substantiated within the Officer Report. Local Planning Authorities are not obliged to submit an Appeal Statement as the reasons for refusal have already been substantiated at the application stage. The Council’s decision to not provide an Appeal Statement has not reduced the significance or adversely impacted the appeal process and eventual decision. I https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/M1595/W/21/3280702 do not find, therefore, that the applicant has incurred unnecessary expense on the appeal process. 6. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance, has not been demonstrated. Consequently, I recommend that the application for an award of costs is refused.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Thomas Courtney

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ — Thurrock Borough Council — Thomas Courtney APPEAL PLANNING OFFICER Inspector’s Decision 7. I have considered all the submitted evidence and the Appeal Planning Officer’s report and, on that basis, I agree with the recommendation and shall refuse the application for costs.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Chris Preston

Wick Place Cottage, Bulphan, Essex, RM14 3TJ — Thurrock Borough Council — Chris Preston INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶2

Council exercised planning judgement dutifully despite not providing Appeal Statement. Reasons for refusal were already substantiated in Officer Report.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶3

Applicant argued that delay in providing Appeal Questionnaire and failure to submit Appeal Statement were unreasonable and led to unnecessary expense.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶4-5

Inspector found that delay did not lead to unnecessary cost and Council's decision not to provide Appeal Statement did not impact appeal process.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Planning Practice Guidance
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 30 November 2022 under the Open Government Licence.