Case 3280309

28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 8DP

London Borough of Bexley — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
4 May 2022
Authority
London Borough of Bexley
Inspector
Praine N
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr REMESH
Agent
Fred Richards & Associates
LPA reference
20/03187/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000004
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
1 December 2021

Summary AI

The applicant sought an award of costs against the Council for a 5-month delay in their decision-making process. However, the Inspector found that the applicant had not demonstrated that the Council's behaviour was unreasonable and resulted in unnecessary expense.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 8DP — London Borough of Bexley — Costs Decision Site visit made on 15 March 2022 by N Praine BSc (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 04 MAY 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/D5120/W/21/3280309 28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath DA6 8DP • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Remish for a full award of costs against the Council of the London Borough of Bexley. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the demolition of existing building office Class E and erection of 4 no self-contained flats Class C3 consisting of 2 no 2 – bed flats and 2 no 1 bed flats. Roof extension including 2 no, rear dormer windows, front rooflights, including addition of balconies at the first-floor level. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (the PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 8DP — London Borough of Bexley — Costs Decision Unreasonable behaviour can be considered as either substantive or procedural in nature. 3. The applicant considers that the Council behaved unreasonably because of a 5- month delay incurred during the Council’s decision-making process. As a result, the applicant has paid a delay charge to their appointed builder as well as the cost of agent fees in preparing and submitting the appeal. 4. It is accepted by the Council that the application was not determined within the statutory time frame and therefore, it falls to determine if the Council behaved unreasonably during its consideration of the planning application. The PPG states that an application for costs will need to clearly demonstrate how any alleged unreasonable behaviour has resulted in unnecessary or wasted expense. 5. There are reasonable explanations as to why planning applications may not meet their statutory time limits, and this can be part of normal planning procedures. However, I have not been provided with any further evidence from either party as to why or how the delays occurred. In addition, I have not been furnished with a detailed explanation, from the applicant, clearly demonstrating why or how the Council acted unreasonably on this occasion. 6.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 8DP — London Borough of Bexley — Costs Decision Delays in decision making have the potential to be unhelpful. However, from the evidence before me, the applicant’s choice to hire a builder with a fixed https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 8DP — London Borough of Bexley — Costs Decision Delays in decision making have the potential to be unhelpful. However, from the evidence before me, the applicant’s choice to hire a builder with a fixed https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Costs Decision APP/D5120/W/21/3280309 date for commencement without first securing planning permission was not a mandatory requirement made by the Council. The decision to take this risk was undertaken by the applicant without influence by the Council. I am also mindful that the PPG states that awards cannot extend to compensation for indirect losses, such as those which may result from alleged delay in obtaining planning permission. 7. I also note the content of the Council’s Decision Notice and Delegated Report. Without contrary evidence, the Council’s position in respect of the scheme is therefore a matter of planning judgement and is fairly substantiated. 8. I therefore find, in this case, that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance, has not been demonstrated. An award of costs is not therefore justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 N Praine

28 Standard Road, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 8DP — London Borough of Bexley — N Praine INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Housing land supply
Against appellant
¶5

The applicant failed to provide evidence that the Council acted unreasonably during the planning application process.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶6

The applicant's decision to hire a builder with a fixed commencement date without securing planning permission was not influenced by the Council and did not result in unnecessary expense.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶8

The Council's position on the scheme was fairly substantiated and not influenced by the applicant's decision to hire a builder with a fixed commencement date.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 May 2022 under the Open Government Licence.