Case 3279454

211 Wickham Road, Croydon, CR0 8TG

London Borough of Croydon — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
20 June 2022
Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Inspector
Shearing C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
MR A SOORA
Agent
Fred Richards & Associates
LPA reference
21/00222/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000008
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
19 January 2022

Summary AI

The application for costs was dismissed due to a lack of evidence of unreasonable behaviour by the respondent.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

211 Wickham Road, Croydon, CR0 8TG — London Borough of Croydon — Costs Decision Site visit made on 24 May 2022 by C Shearing BA (Hons) MA MRTPI An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 20/06/2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/L5240/W/21/3279454 211 Wickham Road, Croydon CR0 8TG • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr A Soora for a full award of costs against the London Borough of Croydon Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for demolishing of ancillary storage outbuilding area attached to the shop situated at the rear garden of 211 Wickham Road CR0 8TG and the erection of a detached building consisting of 1 No, three bedroom 4 Person self-contained unit and 3 Nos, 1 bedroom, 1 Person self- contained unit. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded where a party has behaved unreasonably, and the unreasonable behaviour has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

211 Wickham Road, Croydon, CR0 8TG — London Borough of Croydon — Costs Decision While the applicant has submitted a claim for costs, there has not been an allegation of unreasonable behaviour, nor has a case been put forward that the expenses that are set out in the claim have been incurred unnecessarily. As a result, I cannot find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense to the applicant, as described by the Planning Practice Guidance, has occurred. Conclusion 4. Consequently, the application for an award for costs is refused.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 C Shearing

211 Wickham Road, Croydon, CR0 8TG — London Borough of Croydon — C Shearing INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Other
For appellant
¶2

The Planning Practice Guidance states that costs may be awarded where a party has behaved unreasonably, but the applicant has not made an allegation of unreasonable behaviour.

Other
For appellant
¶3

The applicant has not provided evidence that the expenses set out in their claim were incurred unnecessarily.

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 1 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 20 June 2022 under the Open Government Licence.