Case 3278614

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH

Chelmsford Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
12 November 2021
Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Inspector
Chalk M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr M Slade
Agent
Just Planning
LPA reference
19/00145/S73
ONS LPA code
E07000070
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
23 August 2021

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the condition restricting enlargement and extensions to the new houses in the Green Belt being considered reasonable and necessary to protect openness.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by M Chalk BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — by M Chalk BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 12th November 2021

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM2 8PH

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM2 8PH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Mr M Slade against the decision of Chelmsford City Council. • The application Ref 19/00145/S73, dated 1 May 2021, was refused by notice dated 22 June 2021. • The application sought planning permission for development described as “Demolition of existing kennels and outbuildings. Construction of 3 dwellings. Access, siting and scale not reserved matters, (landscaping and appearance reserved matters)” without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 19/00145/OUT, dated 26 April 2019. • The condition in dispute is No 10 which states that: Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting that Order with or without modification), the dwellings hereby permitted shall not be enlarged or extended without the grant of an additional planning permission by the local planning authority.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM2 8PH

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM2 8PH • The reason given for the condition is: The erection of additional extensions which could be constructed under the provisions of Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting that Order with or without modification) could be disproportionate in size in relation to the existing buildings and would therefore constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt contrary to Policy DC1.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/W1525/W/21/3278614 the existing development. Policy DM6 of the Chelmsford Local Plan 2020 (the LP) contains similar language. 5. I am mindful that the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (the Order) does not require new houses in the Green Belt to be subject to the removal of their permitted development rights. Furthermore, the Framework states that planning conditions should not be used to restrict permitted development rights unless there is a clear justification to do so, while national planning practice guidance advises that conditions restricting the future use of permitted development rights or changes of use may not pass the test of reasonableness or necessity. 6. The new houses could be significantly expanded under permitted development if the appeal were to be allowed. While the addition of extra storeys as included in Class AA of the Order would not be permitted development as the houses were not built by 28 October 2018 as required, there is nevertheless potential for significant additions to the footprints and roofs of the houses.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than Planning permission for the three houses was granted, in part, because the development was considered to result in greater openness in the Green Belt compared to the buildings that previously occupied the site. The removal of permitted development rights relating to enlargement and extensions for the approved houses was considered reasonable and necessary to secure this benefit. 7. The benefit of the improved openness is therefore a consideration in the determination of this appeal. The appellant has not disputed that if the new houses were extended under permitted development then their footprint could exceed that of the buildings formerly on the site, with an attendant impact on the openness of the Green Belt. While there is no guarantee that such large extensions would be built, it is more than a theoretical possibility and therefore carries weight in the determination of this appeal. 8. The appellant has drawn three decisions to my attention in support of their case. In each decision the Inspectors refer to a test of exceptional circumstances in the national guidance to justify removal of permitted development rights. The current national guidance does not include this test.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than This therefore limits the weight that these decisions attract. In any case I must determine this appeal on its own merits. 9. The condition the subject of this appeal only applies to the enlargement of the houses and does not remove other domestic permitted development rights such as those for the construction of outbuildings. In this regard it is precisely defined, in line with national guidance that such conditions make clear exactly which rights have been limited or withdrawn. 10. Given the above considerations, the need to protect the openness of the Green Belt provides clear justification for the removal of permitted development rights from the approved houses. The condition is therefore reasonable and necessary in this instance, in accordance with the Framework and Policy DM6 of the LP. Conclusion 11. For the reasons set out above, the appeal fails.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 M Chalk

Bushmoor Kennels, Goat Hall Lane, CHELMSFORD, CM2 8PH — Chelmsford Borough Council — M Chalk INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Green belt
Against appellant
¶4

The construction of new buildings in the Green Belt is generally inappropriate, but there are exceptions for certain circumstances, such as the redevelopment of previously developed land. The condition restricting enlargement and extensions to the new houses was considered necessary to protect the openness of the Green Belt.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶5

Planning conditions should not be used to restrict permitted development rights unless there is a clear justification to do so. The condition restricting enlargement and extensions to the new houses was considered necessary to protect the openness of the Green Belt.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶6

The new houses could be significantly expanded under permitted development if the appeal were to be allowed, which would impact the openness of the Green Belt.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 149, DC1, DM6
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 November 2021 under the Open Government Licence.