Case 3277692

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG

Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
11 October 2021
Authority
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
Inspector
Wilders B
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
MR M NESARASA
Agent
Mr MICHAEL CARR
LPA reference
DC/2020/01792
ONS LPA code
E08000014
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
20 July 2021

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of outdoor amenity space for future residents, contrary to the Sefton Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 20 September 2021 by Beverley Wilders BA (Hons) PgDurp MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11 October 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/M4320/W/21/3277692 9 Hawthorne Road, Bootle L20 2DG • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Nesarasa against the decision of Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council. • The application Ref DC/2020/01792, dated 8 September 2020, was refused by notice dated 22 January 2021. • The development proposed is external alterations to the shop front to provide separate access and the formation of 1 dwelling to the first and second floors. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Procedural Matters 2. At the time of my visit, the host building appeared to be at least partly in use by ‘Sun N Shade’, manufacturers and suppliers of blinds. In addition, the projecting ground floor porch contained two doors, rather than a window and door as shown on the submitted existing plans. Notwithstanding this, and for the avoidance of doubt, I have assessed the existing building as shown on the submitted plans and not as it appeared at my site visit. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision The Council’s reason for refusal refers to paragraph 127 f) of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). However, in July 2021, after the decision was issued and the appeal was submitted, the Framework was revised. The parties have been given the opportunity to comment on the implications of the revised Framework and in reaching my decision I have had regard to it including paragraph 130 f) which supersedes paragraph 127 f). Main Issue 4. The main issue is whether future occupiers of the proposed dwelling would have satisfactory living conditions having particular regard to outdoor amenity space. Reasons 5. The appeal site comprises a part three storey, two storey and single storey building located centrally within a short terrace of three and two storey buildings. At the time that the application was made, the host building was last in use as a gym but as stated above, it now appears to be in use in https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M4320/W/21/3277692 connection with a business manufacturing and supplying blinds. The building fronts onto Hawthorne Road, with this part of the road comprising other short terraces of buildings containing a mixture of commercial and residential uses. The submitted site location plan and floor plans suggest that there may be a small yard area to the rear of the building but I was unable to verify this at my site visit. 6. The proposed dwelling would be provided with a dedicated access via a door within the ground floor front porch. The Council raises no objection to this aspect of the proposal and I note that the variety of building styles and appearances in the vicinity of the site means that this alteration would not be harmful to the host building or the character and appearance of the area. 7. The dwelling would be on the first and second floors of the host building and would not have access to any outdoor amenity space within the appeal site.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Part 2 of Policy HC4 of the Sefton Local Plan1 relates to development involving the conversion of buildings to flats and it states, amongst other things, that such development will be permitted where it will not cause significant harm to the living conditions for either the occupiers of the property or for neighbouring properties. Paragraph 8.51 of the explanation of the policy states that the Houses in Multiple Occupation and Flats Supplementary Planning Document June 2018 (SPD) provides more guidance on how the policy will be implemented. I therefore attach significant weight to the SPD. 8. Paragraph 31 of the SPD sets out a minimum standard for outdoor amenity spade for flats as 20m² per flat. Paragraph 33 states that the Council may in limited exceptional circumstances accept a lower amount of amenity space if it is not possible to meet the standard but that under no circumstances will the Council accept the provision of no amenity space. Factors that may be relevant to whether a lower standard is acceptable include good access to a local centre and the re-use of an otherwise vacant building that has wider significant or community benefits. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision As stated, in this case, no outdoor amenity space is to be provided and the proposal is therefore in breach of the relevant guidance in the SPD. Although I acknowledge the difficulties in providing outdoor amenity space for residents in buildings such as the host building, paragraph 34 of the SPD nevertheless requires applicants to take all opportunities to maximise amenity space within proposals. In this regard I note that there is a flat roofed single storey extension to the rear of the proposed flat which may have the potential to be used as a roof terrace. Moreover, it does not appear that other possibilities such as balconies have been considered. Consequently, on the basis of the evidence, I do not consider that all opportunities to maximise amenity space have been explored. 10. The proposal does appear to be within easy walking distance of community facilities and public transport and the re-use of the upper floors of the host building would provide some community and regeneration benefits.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision However, given that only one dwelling is proposed, these would be limited and would not be sufficient to outweigh the harm to living conditions that would result from the complete lack of outdoor amenity space for future residents. 1 A Local Plan for Sefton adopted April 2017 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision However, given that only one dwelling is proposed, these would be limited and would not be sufficient to outweigh the harm to living conditions that would result from the complete lack of outdoor amenity space for future residents. 1 A Local Plan for Sefton adopted April 2017 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/M4320/W/21/3277692 11. In reaching my decision I acknowledge that it appears that there are many buildings like the host building in the area, the upper floors of a number of which may be in residential use and with constraints which make it difficult to provide outdoor amenity areas. I also acknowledge that under some circumstances buildings can be converted to flats without planning permission. Nevertheless, planning permission is required in this case and for the reasons stated above, I do not consider that the opportunity to provide outdoor amenity space has been fully explored as is required by the SPD. 12. In failing to provide any outdoor amenity space, the proposal is also contrary to relevant paragraphs of the Framework which seek to ensure well-designed places by ensuring that developments create places that are safe, inclusive and accessible and which promote health and well-being, with a high standard of amenity for existing and future users (paragraph 130f). Whilst the upper floors of the host building may have been in residential use in the past, this does not justify acceptance of the proposal which fails to meet current policies and guidance. 13.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Appeal Decision Taking the above matters into consideration, I conclude that future occupiers of the proposed dwelling would not have satisfactory living conditions having particular regard to outdoor amenity space. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy HC4 of the Sefton Local Plan, to paragraph 130f of the Framework and to relevant guidance in the SPD which seek to ensure, amongst other things, that satisfactory living conditions are provided for occupiers of residential development. Conclusion 14. For the above reasons and having regard to all matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Beverley Wilders

Terrys Fitness, 9-11 Hawthorne Road, BOOTLE, L20 2DG — Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council — Beverley Wilders INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶10

The proposal failed to provide any outdoor amenity space, despite the potential to maximise amenity space within the proposal.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶13

The proposal failed to meet current policies and guidance, including the Sefton Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy HC4 of the Sefton Local Plan
Substantial
paragraph 130f of the Framework
Substantial
relevant guidance in the SPD
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 11 October 2021 under the Open Government Licence.