Case 3275525

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW

Test Valley Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
23 November 2021
Authority
Test Valley Borough Council
Inspector
Smith D
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr David Heelas
Agent
Winterbourne Estates Ltd.
LPA reference
19/00133
ONS LPA code
E07000093
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
5 July 2021

Summary AI

The appeal is allowed for a single bedroom and bathroom adapted for a disabled person, with the details of the proposed roofing materials approved. The proposed roofing material would not detract from the historic village qualities of the Upper Clatford Conservation Area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 17 November 2021 by David Smith BA(Hons) DMS MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 23 November 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/C1760/W/21/3275525 Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, SP11 7LW • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant approval to details required by a condition of a planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr David Heelas against the decision of Test Valley Borough Council. • The application Ref 19/00133/COND5, sought approval of details pursuant to condition No 5 of planning permission Ref 19/00133/FULLN, granted on 23 April 2019. • The application was partially refused by notice dated 27 April 2021. • The development proposed is demolition of existing prefabricated garage, replacement with garage and workroom and a single bedroom and bathroom adapted for a disabled person. • The details for which approval is sought are external materials. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and the details of the proposed roofing materials, submitted with application Ref 19/00133/COND5 pursuant to condition No 5 attached to planning permission Ref 19/00133/FULLN granted on 23 April 2019, are approved.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — Appeal Decision Main Issue 2. The Council has approved the timber cladding and brick plinth for the permitted building. However, the proposed roofing material was not accepted. Therefore the main issue is its effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Upper Clatford Conservation Area. Reasons 3. The permitted building is ‘L’ shaped with a shallow pitched roof and would be located at the end of the garden where a prefabricated garage previously stood. The cluster of buildings to the north of Balksbury House includes other dwellings but also an industrial estate, tennis centre and day nursery. 4. The predominant roofing materials within this group are concrete interlocking tiles with some corrugated sheet roofing. There are slates on Valley House directly adjoining Balksbury House and on its roadside outbuilding. Nevertheless, in this context the use of Marley Modern roof tiles in smooth grey would integrate satisfactorily with the immediately surrounding development. Furthermore, they would match the main roof covering of Balksbury House in line with Policy COM11 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — Appeal Decision This requires ancillary domestic buildings in the countryside to be designed to be in keeping with the existing dwelling. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — Appeal Decision This requires ancillary domestic buildings in the countryside to be designed to be in keeping with the existing dwelling. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/C1760/W/21/3275525 5. The Upper Clatford Conservation Area lies some 90m to the south and is separated from the appeal site by open meadows. The view from it along Balksbury Hill is identified as important in the character appraisal. However, from this direction the roof would be a minor element in the overall scene. The proposed tiles would be viewed against the mixed development with its diverse roof forms that ascends the hill. Therefore, the proposed roofing material would not detract from the historic village qualities of the conservation area. 6. According to the Council, Balksbury House is a non-designated heritage asset. It was built as a small farmhouse in the mid-nineteenth century. Given the use of matching materials as well as the position of the permitted building, the proposed details ensure that it would be a subsidiary structure. The significance of both these heritage assets would therefore not be harmed. 7. As is evident, tiles of this type are frequently used on domestic buildings and so are not intrinsically industrial in style.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — Appeal Decision The Council seeks the use of a smaller tile in a dark colour to reduce the bulk of the building but the proposed tiles would be muted and so would blend in with the surroundings. Interlocking tiles have a chunkier profile than slate which would provide a smoother appearance. However, the roof pitch was lowered to 18 degrees during negotiations on the original application. At this angle the evidence is that neither plain clay tiles nor slates would be watertight. In any event, the proposed tiles are unobjectionable in this location. 8. Therefore the proposed roofing materials would not harm the character and appearance of the area. Local Plan Policy E1 expects high quality development that should, amongst other things improve the character, function and quality of the area. The details proposed are acceptable and the development as a whole would be an enhancement when compared to the former garage. Conclusion 9. For the reasons given the submitted details should be approved and the appeal succeeds.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 David Smith

Balksbury House, Balksbury Hill, Andover, HAMPSHIRE, SP11 7LW — Test Valley Borough Council — David Smith INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶3

The permitted building is 'L' shaped with a shallow pitched roof and would be located at the end of the garden. The cluster of buildings to the north includes other dwellings, an industrial estate, tennis centre and day nursery. The use of Marley Modern roof tiles in smooth grey would integrate satisfactorily with the immediately surrounding development and match the main roof covering of Balksbury House.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶5

The view from the Upper Clatford Conservation Area along Balksbury Hill is identified as important in the character appraisal. However, from this direction the roof would be a minor element in the overall scene. The proposed tiles would be viewed against the mixed development with its diverse roof forms that ascends the hill.

Heritage impact
For appellant
¶6

Balksbury House is a non-designated heritage asset. It was built as a small farmhouse in the mid-nineteenth century. Given the use of matching materials as well as the position of the permitted building, the proposed details ensure that it would be a subsidiary structure. The significance of both these heritage assets would therefore not be harmed.

External appearance
For appellant
¶7

Tiles of this type are frequently used on domestic buildings and so are not intrinsically industrial in style. The proposed tiles would be muted and so would blend in with the surroundings. Interlocking tiles have a chunkier profile than slate which would provide a smoother appearance.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy COM11 of the Test Valley Borough Revised Local Plan
Determinative
Local Plan Policy E1
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 23 November 2021 under the Open Government Licence.