Case 3275158

Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH

Bedford Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
7 September 2021
Authority
Bedford Borough Council
Inspector
Chalk M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Appellant
Mr David Bletsoe
LPA reference
20/02891/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000055
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
10 June 2021

Summary AI

The appeal for a new grain store and access to the public highway was dismissed due to concerns over the visual impact on the area. The benefits of the development, including the need for the building and the overall net biodiversity gain, were outweighed by the harm caused. The proposed development would conflict with policies in the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site Visit made on 9 August 2021 by M Chalk BSc (Hons) MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 07 September 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/K0235/W/21/3275158 Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr David Bletsoe against the decision of Bedford Borough Council. • The application Ref 20/02891/FUL, dated 30 November 2020, was refused by notice dated 3 March 2021. • The development proposed is erection of new grain store and access to public highway. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The Government released a revised National Planning Policy Framework in July 2021. The main parties were invited to comment on the revised document. Main Issue 3. The main issue is the effect on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 4. The store would be a prominent feature in the local landscape, with no other agricultural buildings visible in the area closer than those at the Crowfield Farm complex. It would be more than ten metres in height and would occupy a substantial footprint.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision While set back from the field boundary, due to its overall size it would be highly visible from the road, the public right of way crossing the field and from neighbouring land. 5. The store would be of an appearance not uncommon for agricultural buildings, with the lower walls comprising concrete panels and the upper walls and roof finished in cladding. However, due to its size and siting it would be a large and incongruous feature in the landscape, out of keeping with the largely open fields that comprise the surrounding area. 6. The creation of a new highway access and the attendant visibility splays would necessitate the relocation of an extended section of hedgerow at the front of the site. Additional tree planting would be introduced at the rear of the building but this new planting would take time to establish and provide meaningful screening. Even with the benefits of the new planting and the screening provided by the hedgerow, the store would remain highly visible in the area. It would be particularly visible from the new access with the large concrete apron in front of it an additional incongruous feature in this location. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K0235/W/21/3275158 7. The Council does not contest that there is a need for the building, and I see no reason to dispute that one exists. The benefit of the development to the appellant’s business in allowing segregated storage of grain are acknowledged, and there would be an overall net biodiversity gain from the additional planting. However, these benefits would not outweigh the visual impact of the development in this location. 8. Both main parties have commented on whether an alternative siting of the proposed grain store at the existing complex of farm buildings would be preferable to the proposed. However, no detailed proposals for such a siting have been submitted with this appeal, and therefore it is a consideration that attracts very limited weight. 9. The proposed development would result in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area. It would therefore conflict with Policies 7S, 29, 30 and 37 of the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH — Bedford Borough Council — Appeal Decision Collectively, these state that applications should give particular attention to the relationship of the development with the context in which it is placed and that development in the countryside not result in impacts that would adversely affect the use and enjoyment of the countryside by others. Conclusion 10. There are no material considerations to indicate that this appeal should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the development plan. Therefore, for the reasons set out above the appeal fails.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 M Chalk

Crowfield Farm, Yielden Road, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire, MK44 1BH — Bedford Borough Council — M Chalk INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶4

The store would be a prominent feature in the local landscape, highly visible from the road and neighbouring land, due to its size and siting.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶5

The store's size and appearance would make it a large and incongruous feature in the landscape, out of keeping with the surrounding open fields.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

Even with additional tree planting and hedgerow relocation, the store would remain highly visible in the area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The proposed development would result in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶9

The proposed development would conflict with Policies 7S, 29, 30, and 37 of the Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Bedford Borough Local Plan 2030, Policies 7S, 29, 30, 37
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 7 September 2021 under the Open Government Licence.