Case 3274456

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
9 December 2021
Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Inspector
Bale M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Foxdale Dorset Limited
Agent
Pure Town Planning
LPA reference
APP/20/01031/F
ONS LPA code
E06000058
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
20 July 2021

Summary AI

The appeal for a detached dwelling in Poole was dismissed due to concerns over the development's impact on the area's character and appearance, and the living conditions of the neighbouring property.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — Appeal Decision Site Visit made on 15 September 2021 by M Bale BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 09 December 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/V1260/W/21/3274456 3 Warwick Road, Poole BH14 8SY • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Foxdale Dorset Limited against the decision of Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council. • The application Ref APP/20/01031/F, dated 15 September 2020, was refused by notice dated 31 March 2021. • The development proposed is demolition of garage and construction of a detached dwelling. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issues 2. The main issues are the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, and the living conditions of the occupiers of No.1 Warwick Road with regard to outlook. Reasons Character and appearance 3. The site is within a spacious suburban area. Dwellings of various styles, sizes and ages are inconsistently sited within unevenly sized, heavily landscaped plots, giving an evolving character of piecemeal development. However, even those sited close to their neighbours and the smaller plots, such as Nos.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — Appeal Decision 2, 4 and 4a Belle Vue Road, 1 and 14-18 Corfe View Road, have sufficient stature to make an authoritative contribution to the street scene. 4. Site constraints have led to a design solution that intends to be subservient to the closest dwellings around it. It would be shorter than the neighbouring No.1, despite being on higher ground. The lower rear wing further reduces the massing, and the front elevation would be primarily formed by narrow projecting gables rather than such features being used as embellishment or articulation within a larger composition, as found on some of the older properties within the area. 5. While there is no precedent for dwelling size, the particular details of this proposal would result in a dwelling whose small size would be obvious. It would, thus, appear squashed into its plot to the front of the existing dwelling, rather than as a positive contributor to the street scene. This would undermine the spacious character and appearance of the area, contrary to those aims of Policies PP27 and PP28 of the Poole Local Plan (LP) that seek to ensure that https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V1260/W/21/3274456 local patterns of development are reflected or enhanced and an area’s character is preserved. 6. The appellant’s evidence indicates that, with care during construction, no significant harm would arise to the protected trees at the site. No substantive reasons have been given as to why this may not be the case. The garden areas would be small and partly affected by the trees, but given the relative positions of the garden and trees, it has not been demonstrated that there would be such significant shade that irresistible pressure to fell or prune would result. The lack of harm to trees, however, is a neutral consideration and does not lead me away from my earlier conclusion. Living conditions 7. Moving back from the road frontage, the side site boundary gets closer to the neighbouring dwelling at No.1. It is particularly close alongside ground and first floor windows in the elevation facing the site. The ground floor window serves a kitchen area and while it is linked to a dining area with a glazed door in its opposite elevation, that other opening does little to light or provide outlook to the kitchen. The first floor window is the sole window to a bedroom. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — Appeal Decision The dwelling would be built close to the side boundary and, consequently, close to the above windows. Combined with its position on higher ground it would be significantly overbearing on the outlook from these windows, despite the lower height of the rear section. Even though the relative positions may result in limited effects on direct sunlight, such would result in harmfully oppressive living conditions for the occupiers of the neighbouring dwelling. 9. The site is in an urban environment, where a degree of mutual overlooking often occurs. However, that is not a comparable impact to the opressive conditions that would be created here. Even if similar relationships exist elsewhere, I find no reason that it should be expected as a general consequence of development within built up areas, particularly in spacious ones such as this. Therefore, I find that the proposal would be contrary to the aim of LP Policy PP27 that seeks to avoid harmful impacts on amenity for local residents. Other Matters 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — Appeal Decision The proposal would contribute to the supply of family homes and there is no dispute that paragraph 11(d) of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) falls to be considered by virtue of the Housing Delivery Test results. Small sites can be easily developed and, therefore, make an important contribution to boosting housing delivery. While making good use of urban land, though, the benefits associated with the provision of one single dwelling are only of moderate weight, even if there were a substantial shortfall in delivery. The harms that I have identified significantly and demonstrably outweigh these benefits. The proposals do not, therefore, benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development, outlined in the Framework. 11. Permission was also refused due to alleged unmitigated effects on habitats sites. A legal agreement has been provided relating to this matter. Whether or not that adequately secures mitigation, in light of my overall conclusion, adverse effects on habitats sites would not arise from my decision. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V1260/W/21/3274456

Page 3 · Chunk 6 INSPECTOR

3 Warwick Road, POOLE, BH14 8SY — Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole — INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶3-5

The proposal would result in a dwelling that appears squashed into its plot, undermining the spacious character and appearance of the area, contrary to policies PP27 and PP28 of the Poole Local Plan.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶7-9

The dwelling would be overbearing on the outlook from the neighbouring windows, creating harmfully oppressive living conditions for the occupiers.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
PP27
Substantial
PP28
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 9 December 2021 under the Open Government Licence.