Case 3274329

Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP

Cherwell District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
14 April 2022
Authority
Cherwell District Council
Inspector
Chandler M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Clive Collison
Agent
Mr Charles Robinson
LPA reference
20/01762/OUT
ONS LPA code
E07000177
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
5 January 2022

Summary AI

The application for an award of costs against Cherwell District Council was dismissed. The inspector found that the Council's approach to the application was not unreasonable, and therefore, an award of costs was not justified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 15 March 2022 by Martin Chandler BSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14 April 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/C3105/W/21/3274329 Land to Rear of Home Farm Close, Ambrosden OX25 2NP • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Collison for a full award of costs against Cherwell District Council. • The appeal was against the failure of the Council to determine the application within the prescribed period of time. The application sought outline planning permission for a development originally described as: ‘Outline consent including access for five dwellings.’ Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably, and that the unreasonable behaviour has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. Awards can be based on either procedural or substantive matters. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Costs Decision It is the appellant’s case that the Council has failed to determine the application in a positive and proactive manner. In their view, this has been demonstrated in the requirement for the appellant to enter into a comprehensive Section 106 agreement with the adjoining landowner, without providing adequate justification. 4. Despite this, as identified in my decision, I find that the approach taken by the Council has not been without merit. The desire to make effective use of land is well supported by the National Planning Policy Framework and although I have found against the Council in regard to the main issue, I do not consider that their approach has prevented development coming forward which should have clearly been allowed. 5. Through the appeal, the Council have provided a well-articulated case regarding the comprehensive development of the appeal site and adjacent land. Although I do not agree with it, they have fully justified their concerns and the argument presented is not without substance. 6. Accordingly, I am satisfied that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/Y2620/W/21/3267614 Guidance, has not been demonstrated and that therefore, an award of costs is not justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Martin Chandler

Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Martin Chandler INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
For appellant
¶null

The appellant claimed that the Council failed to determine the application in a positive and proactive manner.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶null

The inspector found that the Council's approach had merit and was not unreasonable, as it was justified by the National Planning Policy Framework.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶null

The inspector found that the Council's argument regarding the comprehensive development of the appeal site and adjacent land was well-articulated and fully justified.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
National Planning Policy Framework
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 April 2022 under the Open Government Licence.