Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP
Cherwell District Council — appeal allowed
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Decision date
- 14 April 2022
- Authority
- Cherwell District Council
- Inspector
- Chandler M
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Outline
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Mr Clive Collison
- Agent
- Mr Charles Robinson
- LPA reference
- 20/01762/OUT
- ONS LPA code
- E07000177
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 5 January 2022
Summary AI
The application for an award of costs against Cherwell District Council was dismissed. The inspector found that the Council's approach to the application was not unreasonable, and therefore, an award of costs was not justified.
PDF text
Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 15 March 2022 by Martin Chandler BSc MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 14 April 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/C3105/W/21/3274329 Land to Rear of Home Farm Close, Ambrosden OX25 2NP • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Collison for a full award of costs against Cherwell District Council. • The appeal was against the failure of the Council to determine the application within the prescribed period of time. The application sought outline planning permission for a development originally described as: ‘Outline consent including access for five dwellings.’ Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably, and that the unreasonable behaviour has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. Awards can be based on either procedural or substantive matters. 3.
Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Costs Decision It is the appellant’s case that the Council has failed to determine the application in a positive and proactive manner. In their view, this has been demonstrated in the requirement for the appellant to enter into a comprehensive Section 106 agreement with the adjoining landowner, without providing adequate justification. 4. Despite this, as identified in my decision, I find that the approach taken by the Council has not been without merit. The desire to make effective use of land is well supported by the National Planning Policy Framework and although I have found against the Council in regard to the main issue, I do not consider that their approach has prevented development coming forward which should have clearly been allowed. 5. Through the appeal, the Council have provided a well-articulated case regarding the comprehensive development of the appeal site and adjacent land. Although I do not agree with it, they have fully justified their concerns and the argument presented is not without substance. 6. Accordingly, I am satisfied that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/Y2620/W/21/3267614 Guidance, has not been demonstrated and that therefore, an award of costs is not justified.
Land off Home Farm Close, Ambrosden, OX25 2NP — Cherwell District Council — Martin Chandler INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Living conditions For appellant ¶null
The appellant claimed that the Council failed to determine the application in a positive and proactive manner.
Living conditions Against appellant ¶null
The inspector found that the Council's approach had merit and was not unreasonable, as it was justified by the National Planning Policy Framework.
Living conditions Against appellant ¶null
The inspector found that the Council's argument regarding the comprehensive development of the appeal site and adjacent land was well-articulated and fully justified.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| National Planning Policy Framework |
Moderate |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 14 April 2022 under the Open Government Licence.