Case 3274016

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH

London Borough of Havering — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
21 January 2022
Authority
London Borough of Havering
Inspector
Savage K
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr William Eve
Agent
Lyondale Ltd
LPA reference
P1561.20
ONS LPA code
E09000016
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
9 September 2021

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed for the formation of an external seating area at The Bank Restaurant, but dismissed for the proposed front canopy, which was deemed to be harmful to the character and appearance of the area. The decision was based on the inspector's assessment of the development plan and material considerations.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 14 December 2021 by K Savage BA(Hons) MPlan MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 21 January 2022 Appeal Ref: APP/B5480/W/21/3274016 The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch RM12 4RH • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr William Eve against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Havering. • The application Ref P1561.20, dated 24 October 2020, was refused by notice dated 6 January 2021. • The development proposed is installation of front canopy and formation of external seating area. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed insofar as it relates to the proposed front canopy. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for formation of external seating area, at The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch RM12 4RH, in accordance with the terms of the application Ref P1561.20, dated 24 October 2020, and subject to the following conditions: 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision 2) The external seating area hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 09-PP-200; 09-PP-201; 09-PP-202; 09-PP-203; 09-PP-204; 09-PP-205; 09-PP-206; 09-PP-207; 09-PP-208; 09-PP-209. 3) The external seating area hereby permitted shall not be used by patrons of the appeal premises after 10:30pm Monday through Sunday and all Bank/Public Holidays. All tables, chairs and means of enclosure shall be removed from the footway when the seating area is not in use and at no time shall they be in situ outside of the permitted hours. Preliminary Matters 2. The Council adopted the new Havering Local Plan (2016 to 2031) (the HLP) on 17 November 2021, during the appeal process, replacing The Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD (2008) which has been withdrawn. I have therefore had regard only to the relevant policies of the HLP in determining the appeal. The main parties have been afforded the opportunity to comment on this material change to the policy context, and I have taken the replies received into consideration. 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision The Council’s evidence refers to the Shopfront Design Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPD) (June 2013); however I am advised that this SPD has been https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision The Council’s evidence refers to the Shopfront Design Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPD) (June 2013); however I am advised that this SPD has been https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/B5480/W/21/3274016 withdrawn following adoption of the HLP and thus no longer attracts weight as a material planning consideration. Thus, I have not had regard to this SPD. 4. For the reasons that follow, I find the proposed external seating area to be acceptable and clearly severable both physically and functionally from the proposed front canopy. Therefore, I intend to issue a split decision in this case and grant planning permission for the external seating area only. Main Issue 5. The main issue is the effect of the proposed canopy on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons Front Canopy 6. The appeal site is located within commercial frontage forming part of the Elm Park Minor District Centre (EPMDC), centred on the nearby roundabout at the junction of Elm Park Avenue and St Nicholas Avenue/The Broadway, with retail and other commercial uses extending at ground floor level in all directions from the roundabout. 7. The parade of which the appeal site forms part comprises a long, three storey, red brick building containing ten ground floor units, each with a flat-fronted façade. The proposal seeks to install a solid canopy structure to the front of the building extending over the footway.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision There are no comparable examples of such a feature in the parade or elsewhere in the EPMDC. The canopy, at some 2.2 metres in depth, would form a highly prominent feature projecting out from the building that would be substantially larger than the modest projecting signs to other shopfronts that represent the only fixed projecting elements on the frontage. The canopy would therefore appear as an incongrous addition to the street scene that would draw the eye in views from all sides and harmfully disrupt the consistent frontage of the parade. It would also oversail and partially obscure the fascia signage of the premises. 8. There are several examples of blinds and awnings within the EPMDC; however, these are retractable types which can be concealed when not in use, and do not form permanent projections in front of the shopfront. Consequently, I do not regard these examples as comparable to, or justification for, the proposed fixed canopy which would be harmful for the reasons set out above. 9. Therefore, I conclude that the proposed canopy would be harmful to the character and appearance of the area.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision This would conflict with Policy 26 of the HLP, which requires development to achieve high quality design that, among other things, respects, reinforces and complements the local street scene and respects the visual integrity and established rhythm of building frontages. External Seating Area 10. The Council did not refuse permission in respect of the proposed external seating area. Unlike the canopy, this would not be a permanent alteration to the shopfront as the tables and chairs could be removed when not in use. The Council refers to other examples of external seating though, perhaps not unexpectedly, I did not see other seating at my visit in winter. Nonetheless, external seating is an increasingly common feature of shopping parades, and https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/B5480/W/21/3274016 thus would not appear out of character with the commercial surroundings. I find that the proposal would accord with the design aims of Policy 26. 11. Objection was not raised by the local highway authority in terms of pedestrian safety. I saw the footway outside the site to be wide and whilst there is other street furniture such as trees, road signs, litter bins, cycle stands and parking meters, there would be sufficient room for pedestrians to pass safely. I am satisfied that the proposal would be acceptable in this respect and would accord with Policy 26 which requires that developments fully integrate with neighbouring developments, existing path and circulation networks and provide a high standard of inclusive access for all members of the public. 12. Objections have been raised by interested parties in respect of potential nuisance from use of the external area, given the late night opening of the premises and the presence of residential uses above. The premises is described as one of the only late night uses in the area, which would suggest that noise levels in the area are otherwise low in the evening.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision Extended use into the night could therefore give rise to noise and disturbance to the detriment of nearby residents. The Council has suggested a condition which would limit the use of the external seating area to no later than 10:30pm on any day. I consider this time limit reasonable in the circumstances, and if applied would provide sufficient safeguards for neighbouring residents’ living conditions. Other Material Considerations 13. The appellant advances that, in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, the proposal would deliver health benefits in terms of providing safe outdoor seating for people to socialise. I also note several letters of support in this respect. I accept that external seating, in the current circumstances, may offer a benefit in this regard. However, the scale of the proposal is modest, and therefore the benefits arising would be limited in scale. Moreover, these benefits would mainly be attributable to the seating area itself, with the canopy forming an ancillary feature to provide it with cover. However, it is not the only means by which cover for the seating area could be achieved, and therefore I afford very limited weight to the functional benefit of the canopy. Conclusions 14.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — Appeal Decision For the reasons set out, I conclude that the proposed canopy would result in conflict with the development plan, to which I afford significant weight. Material considerations advanced in this case would not outweigh this conflict so as to justify granting planning permission. Therefore, I conclude that this part of the appeal should be dismissed. 15. However, I find that the proposed external seating area would accord with the development plan, taken as a whole, and as it is physically and functional severable from the proposed canopy, I conclude that this part of the appeal should be allowed. I have imposed a condition requiring that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans, and only in relation to the part of the proposal permitted, in the interests of certainty. As set out above, a condition limiting the hours of use of the external seating area is also necessary to protect the living conditions of nearby residents.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 K Savage

The Bank Restaurant, 9 Elm Parade, St Nicholas Avenue, Hornchurch, RM12 4RH — London Borough of Havering — K Savage INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7-9

The proposed front canopy was deemed to be an incongruous addition to the street scene, would disrupt the consistent frontage of the parade, and would harmfully draw the eye in views from all sides.

Living conditions
For appellant
¶12

The external seating area was deemed to be acceptable in terms of living conditions, as a condition limiting the hours of use to 10:30pm was considered sufficient to protect the living conditions of nearby residents.

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶2

The inspector considered the new Havering Local Plan (2016 to 2031) to be the relevant policy context, and took the replies received into consideration.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
HLP 26
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 21 January 2022 under the Open Government Licence.