Case 3273049

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR

West Lancashire District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
22 October 2021
Authority
West Lancashire District Council
Inspector
McDonagh C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Ms Elizabeth Quick
Agent
Just Planning
LPA reference
2021/0140/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000127
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
5 July 2021

Summary AI

The appeal was allowed, and the planning permission was varied by deleting condition 5. The inspector considered that the condition was unnecessary and conflicted with national policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by C McDonagh BA (Hons) MA MRTPI

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — by C McDonagh BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 22 October 2021

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Mickering Cottage, Mickering Lane, Aughton L39 6SR

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Mickering Cottage, Mickering Lane, Aughton L39 6SR • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Ms Elizabeth Quick against the decision of West Lancashire Borough Council. • The application Ref 2021/0140/FUL, dated 3 February 2021, was refused by notice dated 23 March 2021. • The application sought planning permission for ‘conversion of existing building to single dwelling’ without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 8/98/0127, dated 28 October 1998.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Mickering Cottage, Mickering Lane, Aughton L39 6SR

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Mickering Cottage, Mickering Lane, Aughton L39 6SR • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the development of land without complying with conditions subject to which a previous planning permission was granted. • The appeal is made by Ms Elizabeth Quick against the decision of West Lancashire Borough Council. • The application Ref 2021/0140/FUL, dated 3 February 2021, was refused by notice dated 23 March 2021. • The application sought planning permission for ‘conversion of existing building to single dwelling’ without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 8/98/0127, dated 28 October 1998.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Mickering Cottage, Mickering Lane, Aughton L39 6SR

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Mickering Cottage, Mickering Lane, Aughton L39 6SR • The condition in dispute is No 5 which states that: Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development and General Development Procedure) Orders 1995 or any subsequent Orders or statutory provision re-enacting the provisions of these Orders no garages, extensions, alterations, porches, garden sheds, out buildings, greenhouses, swimming pools, hardstandings or means of enclosure shall be erected or undertaken without the express written permission of the Local Planning Authority • The reason given for the condition is: The character and location of the property are such that the Local Planning Authority wish to exercise maximum control over future development

Page 1 · Chunk 4 Belt.

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Belt. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 5 Belt.

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Belt. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/P2365/W/21/3273049 Reasons 4. The appeal site comprises a detached, two-storey dwelling which sits in a generous plot among a cluster of similar properties. The planning history of the site indicates the building was formerly in agricultural use and was permitted for conversion into a dwelling subject to conditions. Some extensions were reinstated or replaced as part of the conversion and the Council, at the time of the approval, included a condition to withdraw permitted development rights for several development types for the property due to its location within the Green Belt. The proposal seeks to remove this condition. 5. My attention is drawn to the Development in the Green Belt Supplementary Planning Document (the SPD). This states the Council reserves the right to remove permitted development rights for development which may have an adverse impact upon the openness of the Green Belt. This may include extensions and outbuildings, fences or activities such as external storage. 6. However, paragraph 54 of the Framework states planning conditions should not be used to restrict national permitted development rights unless there is clear justification to do so.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Belt.

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Belt. Expanding on this, the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises conditions restricting the future use of permitted development rights or changes of use may not pass the test of reasonableness or necessity. The scope of such conditions needs to be precisely defined, by reference to the relevant provisions in the GPDO, so that it is clear exactly which rights have been limited or withdrawn. 7. The Government attaches great importance to Green Belts. The fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Be that as it may, the GPDO does not withdraw permitted development rights from buildings within the Green Belt on this basis alone and there is nothing in the Framework which indicates that such rights should be restricted in the Green Belt as a matter of course. 8. I understand the concern that future additions to the dwelling or within its curtilage could impact on the openness of the Green Belt. It is also considered that the extensions approved in the original permission allowed the property to grow to a size that was considered to be of maximum allowable without harming the openness of the Green Belt. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 Belt.

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Belt. However, I understand those extensions were largely rebuilt or replaced, while other outbuildings were removed which would have increased openness. Moreover, any works that would be considered to fall under permitted development rights would still be subject to control under the relevant restrictions and conditions specified in the relevant sections of the GPDO. Even without Council control and assessment under paragraph 149(c) of the Framework, there is nothing before me to indicate any future extensions or alterations would necessarily be a disproportionate addition to the original building given the restrictions the GPDO places on these developments. In any event, Green Belt policy in the Framework does not require permitted development to be assessed against whether it is inappropriate or not, nor is it necessary to assess any impact on openness. 10. As such, I do not consider that any potential impact on the Green Belt would amount to the clear justification required to warrant withholding permitted https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Belt.

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — Belt. Appeal Decision APP/P2365/W/21/3273049 development rights. I find the disputed planning condition is unnecessary and conflicts with paragraph 54 of the Framework and advice in the PPG. Conclusion 11. For the reasons given above I conclude that the planning permission should be varied as set out in the formal decision.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 C McDonagh

Mickering Cottage , Mickering Lane, Ormskirk, L39 6SR — West Lancashire District Council — C McDonagh INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶3

The main issue was whether the condition was necessary and reasonable having regard to local and national policies relating to proposals affecting the Green Belt.

Green belt
For appellant
¶8-10

The inspector considered that the potential impact on the Green Belt would not amount to the clear justification required to warrant withholding permitted development rights.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 54
Determinative
PPG
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 22 October 2021 under the Open Government Licence.