OS Field 3541, Yarm Lane , Great Ayton , North Yorkshire, TS9 6PJ
Hambleton District Council * — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 20 August 2021
- Authority
- Hambleton District Council *
- Inspector
- Brooker M
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appellant
- Mr I Khalil
- Agent
- Mr Gordon Henderson
- LPA reference
- 20/02484/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E07000164
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 30 April 2021
Summary AI
The Inspector refused to award costs to Hambleton District Council against Mr Khalil, citing lack of evidence of unreasonable behavior by the Appellant. The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for a dwelling.
PDF text
OS Field 3541, Yarm Lane , Great Ayton , North Yorkshire, TS9 6PJ — Hambleton District Council * — Costs Decision Site visit made on 20/07/2021 by Mr M Brooker DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 20 August 2021 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/G2713/W/21/3272960 Land off Yarm Lane, Great Ayton Easting: 455427 Northing: 510468 • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Hambleton District Council for a full award of costs against Mr I Khalil. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for a dwelling. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Reasons 2. The Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. It is the Council’s case that the Appellant behaved unreasonably resulting directly in them incurring unnecessary expense in the appeal process, in particular with regards the evidence provided by the appellant to address previously identified issues. 4.
OS Field 3541, Yarm Lane , Great Ayton , North Yorkshire, TS9 6PJ — Hambleton District Council * — Costs Decision The Council details that they provided to the Appellant a specific list of “fundamental issues” that were identified at the time an application was first made, this included “Flood risk, ecology, the relationship to the settlement, impact on the Conservation Area, design, and character of the open countryside” 5. I note that the application from which the related appeal resulted did include further details, as acknowledged by the Council in their costs application, relating specifically to ecology, the access from Yarm Lane, landscaping and a revised Flood Risk Assessment. 6. In determining the Appeal, I found that the appellant’s sequential assessment did not adequately demonstrate the absence of other sites. Nonetheless, the appellant has sought in some way to grapple with the issue of flood risk and attempted to justify their approach to the sequential assessment. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
OS Field 3541, Yarm Lane , Great Ayton , North Yorkshire, TS9 6PJ — Hambleton District Council * — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/g2713/w/21/3272960 7. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance, has not been demonstrated and that an award of costs is not justified.
OS Field 3541, Yarm Lane , Great Ayton , North Yorkshire, TS9 6PJ — Hambleton District Council * — Mark Brooker INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Living conditions Against appellant ¶3
The Council claimed that the Appellant's sequential assessment did not adequately demonstrate the absence of other sites, but the Appellant attempted to address the issue of flood risk.
Other For appellant
The Inspector found that the Council did not demonstrate unreasonable behavior by the Appellant, resulting in unnecessary expense.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Planning Practice Guidance on costs |
Limited |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 20 August 2021 under the Open Government Licence.