Case 3271445

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP

South Cambridgeshire District Council — appeal split decision

Outcome
Split Decision
Decision date
29 November 2021
Authority
South Cambridgeshire District Council
Inspector
Chandler M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Landbrook Homes Ltd
Agent
Landbrook Homes Ltd
LPA reference
S/0277/19/COND9
ONS LPA code
E07000012
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Lead
Start date
2 August 2021

Summary AI

Two appeals against a failure to give notice within a prescribed period of a decision on an application for consent, agreement or approval to details required by a condition of a planning permission were considered. The appeals were submitted outside of the time limits established within Article 37, but due to the history of the original applications, a longer period for the submission of the appeals was justified.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by Martin Chandler BSc, MA, MRTPI

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — by Martin Chandler BSc, MA, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 29TH November 2021

Page 1 · Chunk 1 The Retreat, Fews Lane, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — The Retreat, Fews Lane, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a failure to give notice within a prescribed period of a decision on an application for consent, agreement or approval to details required by a condition of a planning permission. • The appeal is made by Landbrook Homes Ltd against South Cambridgeshire District Council. The application Ref S/0277/19/COND9, dated 15 April 2020, sought approval of details pursuant to condition No 9 of planning permission Ref S/0277/19/FL granted on 9 May 2019. • The development proposed is demolition of the existing bungalow and construction of two dwellings including car parking and landscaping. • The details for which approval is sought are details for the provision and implementation of foul and surface water drainage.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 The Retreat, Fews Lane, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — The Retreat, Fews Lane, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a failure to give notice within a prescribed period of a decision on an application for consent, agreement or approval to details required by a condition of a planning permission. • The appeal is made by Landbrook Homes Ltd against South Cambridgeshire District Council. The application Ref S/4471/19/DC, dated 20 December 2019, sought approval of details pursuant to condition No 7 of planning permission Ref S/0277/19/FL granted on 9 May 2019. • The development proposed is demolition of the existing bungalow and construction of two dwellings including car parking and landscaping. • The details for which approval is sought are revised Traffic Management Plan as prepared by SLR Consulting in May 2019.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow.

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow.

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decisions APP/W0530/W/21/3271445 and APP/W0530/W/21/3271446 4. The appeals were submitted outside of the time limits established within Article 37. However, within the evidence before me, it is clear that communication between the appellant and the Council took place regarding the timeliness of decision making. Accordingly, I am satisfied that this is not a scenario whereby the appellant simply submitted the original applications and then sat idle. Instead, the appellant was chasing the necessary decisions in a timely manner. Accordingly, due to the history of the original applications, in accordance with Paragraph (1) (a) (ii), I am content that a longer period for the submission of the appeals is justified. As a consequence, for the purposes of my assessment, the appeals are valid, and I will proceed on this basis. Main Issue 5. The main issue for both appeals is whether the information submitted in relation to each condition, is sufficient to comply with their requirements. Reasons Appeal A 6. The proposed Drainage Layout drawing demonstrates that drainage for the proposed dwellings would be dealt with via soakaways.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow.

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow. The proposal has also been supplemented by an Infiltration Test Report as well as soakaway calculations. I note comments from an interested party regarding the details provided on the Below Ground Construction Details drawing, specifically regarding the water attenuation tank. However, on the basis of the evidence before me, I am satisfied that this element of the broader drainage scheme does not relate to the development that is before me. Accordingly, on this matter, I find that the concerns presented by Fews Lane Consortium Ltd are not relevant to my assessment of the appeal. 7. The evidence before me confirms that the Council’s Sustainable Drainage Engineer is satisfied with the drainage proposals. In addition, Anglian Water have also confirmed that the foul water proposals are acceptable. I have no substantive evidence before me to disagree with these findings and consequently, I conclude that the information submitted in relation to Condition 9 of Planning Permission ref: S/0277/19/FL granted on 9 May 2019, is sufficient to comply with its requirements. 8.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow.

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow. Notwithstanding the above, the wording of the condition is such that full compliance will not have been achieved until the scheme has been constructed and completed in accordance with the approved plans, prior to the occupation of the development, or in accordance with an implementation programme agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Appeal B 9. Amongst other things, Condition 7 requires that contractor parking shall be within the curtilage of the site and not on the street. The appeal refers to a detailed Traffic Management Plan dated December 2019 (TMP) and I note that the Local Highways Authority are content with the details submitted. I also note that the TMP has been relied upon when granting consent for other developments on the broader site. 10. Despite this, the TMP clearly states that although parking will be provided on-site, an off-site location will also be used for contractors. The TMP is https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow.

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — period as the Secretary of State may, at any time, allow. Appeal Decisions APP/W0530/W/21/3271445 and APP/W0530/W/21/3271446 thorough on this point and states that alternative transport will be provided for contractors to get to and from the site, and in this respect, the proposal would appear to be mindful of highway safety. However, as identified above, the condition is clear in its requirements regarding contractor parking, and based on the evidence before me, the site would not be developed on this basis. 11. It is not for this appeal to consider the wording of the condition, or whether the condition complies with the tests for the use of conditions as set out within the National Planning Policy Framework. Instead, the judgement is a simple matter regarding whether the information submitted complies with the requirements of the condition. On this basis, for the reasons identified above, I conclude that the information submitted would not comply with the requirements of Condition 7 of Planning Permission ref: S/0277/19/FL granted on 9 May 2019. Conclusion 12. For the reasons identified above, Appeal A is allowed. However, Appeal B is dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Martin Chandler

The Retreat, Fews Lane, Longstanton, CAMBRIDGE, CB24 3DP — South Cambridgeshire District Council — Martin Chandler INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Conditions
For appellant
¶7

The drainage proposals, including the proposed Drainage Layout drawing, Infiltration Test Report, and soakaway calculations, were found to be sufficient to comply with the requirements of Condition 9 of Planning Permission ref: S/0277/19/FL granted on 9 May 2019.

Conditions
Against appellant
¶11

The information submitted for Condition 7 of Planning Permission ref: S/0277/19/FL granted on 9 May 2019 did not comply with the requirements of the condition, as contractor parking would be both on-site and off-site.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
NPPF 208
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 29 November 2021 under the Open Government Licence.