Case 3271315

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL

Ashford Borough Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
5 August 2021
Authority
Ashford Borough Council
Inspector
Ayres J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Householder developments
Appellant
Mr & Mrs C Ashton
LPA reference
20/00005/AS
ONS LPA code
E07000105
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Lead
Start date
23 November 2020

Summary AI

The inspector dismissed the appeals due to the proposed rear extension's impact on the special interest of the Grade II listed building. The extension's large scale, design, and materials would clash with the building's simple style and historical interest.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 by J Ayres BA Hons, Solicitor

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — by J Ayres BA Hons, Solicitor an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 05 AUGUST 2021

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Green Lane Farmhouse, Green Lane, Challock TN25 4BL

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — Green Lane Farmhouse, Green Lane, Challock TN25 4BL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr and Mrs C Ashton against the decision of Ashford Borough Council. • The application Ref 20/00005/AS, dated 23 December 2019, was refused by notice dated 27 April 2020. • The development proposed is erection of a single storey rear extension and alteration to first floor bedroom window.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Green Lane Farmhouse, Green Lane, Challock TN25 4BL

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — Green Lane Farmhouse, Green Lane, Challock TN25 4BL • The appeal is made under section 20 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 against a refusal to grant listed building consent. • The appeal is made by Mr and Mrs C Ashton against the decision of Ashford Borough Council. • The application Ref 20/00006/AS, dated 23 December 2019, was refused by notice dated 28 April 2020 • The development proposed is erection of a single storey rear extension and alteration to first floor bedroom window.

Page 1 · Chunk 3 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 4 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 5 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. Appeal Decisions APP/E2205/W/20/3271315 Main Issue 5. The main issue is the effect of the proposed works on the special interest of the Grade II listed building. Reasons 6. The building was listed in August 1984. It is detailed as being an early 18th Century farmhouse made of brick with a plain tiled hipped roof. The elevation fronting the Lane has a pleasant symmetry, and there is a small lean-to element on one side. Having regard to the listing and my observations I find that the special interest of the listed building is architectural and historical insofar as it relates to these appeals. 7. The particulars of sale dated 9 January 1945 refer to a picturesque, old- fashioned, ivy-clad brick and tiled unimproved farmhouse, with water supplied from a well located on the property. Its special interest is primarily associated with the simple, traditional form of dwelling which is experienced alongside the cluster of the nearby ancillary buildings. It is accessed via a driveway between the farmhouse and ancillary buildings, and when entering the site, the farmhouse maintains an intimate relationship with the nearby structures. It is a building that has survived as part of a small cluster and largely retains its plan form.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. 8. I note that the appellant has included a newspaper article referring to a fire at the farmhouse in 1872. They have also referred in their evidence to discussions with local individuals who, being familiar with the area and history of the area, assert that the farmhouse is not an early 18 century building as listed and that there is an error in the dating of the building. Whist there may be some discrepancies in the history of the farmhouse, it is not within the remit of my decision for me to amend the listing, and I have no evidence before me to suggest that the appellant has approached Historic England with a view to amending the listing. Accordingly, I have considered the special interest and significance of the asset based not only on the listing but the observations at my site visit and on the evidence submitted. There appear to be a number of alterations that may have been made to the property over a period of time. However, these do not alter my own assessment of its special interest. 9. The proposal would include the erection of a rear extension which would combine a double pitched roof, with flat roofs on either side.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. The extension would be some 4.5 metres in depth and would stretch along the entire length of the rear elevation. The large scale of the extension would be a considerable addition to the farmhouse which would overwhelm the understated scale and form of the listed building. Moreover, the symmetrical and box like design of the extension would be a discordant addition when viewed against the irregular rear elevation of the farmhouse. 10. The extension would involve an overly and unnecessary complicated roof design, which would be a stark contrast to the simple double pitch of the farmhouse roof, which would appear as a jarring and discordant addition to the property. This clash would be exasperated by the proposed palette of materials, which would not respect the simple style of the farmhouse. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 8 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. Appeal Decisions APP/E2205/W/20/3271315 11. Whilst views of the extension would not be possible from the Lane, a significant level of historic fabric would be removed, and I find that the extension would be harmful to the special interest of the building itself. 12. The proposal would result in an inharmonious extension and the proposal would not preserve the grade II listed building, and its features or architectural and historical interest described above. The proposal would conflict with Policies SP1, SP6, ENV13 and HOU8 of the Ashford Borough Local Plan 2030. These policies collectively seek to ensure high quality design, with development suitable in terms of its size, scale and materials, which conserves and enhances heritage assets. Planning Balance and Conclusion 13. Paragraph 199 of the Framework advises that when considering the impact of development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation. That is irrespective of whether the harm amounts to substantial harm, total loss or less than substantial harm.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. Consistent with that approach, paragraph 200 says that any harm to, or loss of, the significance of a designated heritage asset, including from its alteration, should require clear and convincing justification. Although the degree of harm I have identified would be less than substantial, this does not equate to a less than substantial planning objection, especially where the statutory tests are not met. 14. In that case, paragraph 202 of the Framework indicates that the harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal. Whilst the appellant has stated their commitment as custodians of the building, the proposal is essentially for the private benefit of the appellant rather than for the benefit of the public at large. The additional internal space for the occupiers of the house would not amount to a public benefit. 15. In the absence of any public benefit to outweigh the harm identified above, I conclude that the works would fail to preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the grade II listed building, the requirements of the Act, the Framework and the requirements and objectives of the development plan. 16.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 chapter 16 of the Framework.

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — chapter 16 of the Framework. For the above reasons, and having regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that the appeals should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 11 J Ayres

Green Lane Farmhouse Green Lane, Challock, ASHFORD, TN25 4BL — Ashford Borough Council — J Ayres INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶6

The special interest of the listed building is architectural and historical, and the proposed works would harm this special interest.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶7

The building's simple, traditional form and its relationship with the nearby ancillary buildings would be disrupted by the proposed works.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶9

The large scale and design of the extension would overwhelm the understated scale and form of the listed building.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶10

The proposed roof design and materials would clash with the building's simple style and historical interest.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶11

A significant level of historic fabric would be removed by the proposed extension.

Heritage impact
Against appellant
¶12

The proposal would not preserve the grade II listed building, its features, or its architectural and historical interest.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶13

The proposal would conflict with Policies SP1, SP6, ENV13 and HOU8 of the Ashford Borough Local Plan 2030.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
SP1, SP6, ENV13, HOU8
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 5 August 2021 under the Open Government Licence.