Case 3271102

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS

Elmbridge Borough Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
1 July 2021
Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Inspector
Blackwell J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Minor retail and services
Appellant
InPost
Agent
NL Jones Planning
LPA reference
2020/2860
ONS LPA code
E07000207
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
22 April 2021

Summary AI

The appeal for an InPost locker at a petrol filling station in Cobham, Surrey, has been allowed. The inspector found that the development would not harm the character and appearance of the area, and would be consistent with local and national planning policies.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision Site Visit made on 22 June 2021 by James Blackwell LLB (Hons) an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 01 July 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/K3605/W/21/3271102 Petrol Filling Station, Stoke Road, Cobham, Surrey KT11 3AS • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by InPost against the decision of Elmbridge Borough Council. • The application Ref 2020/2860, dated 28 October 2020, was refused by notice dated 29 December 2020. • The development proposed is the siting of an InPost Locker. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the siting of an InPost Locker at Petrol Filling Station, Stoke Road, Cobham, Surrey KT11 3AS in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2020/2860, dated 28 October 2020, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions: (1) The development hereby approved shall be retained in strict accordance with the following approved drawings: 20-01256_SRC01 (Site Location Plan); and 20-01256_SRC03 (Proposed Elevations).

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision (2) The development hereby approved shall be retained in the materials set out in Section 7 (Materials) of the Application Form received by the Council on 28/10/2020 unless otherwise agreed by the Council in writing. Preliminary Matters 2. This appeal relates to a retrospective planning application, so references to the development relate to development already carried out. 3. To ensure clarity in the description of development, I have removed duplicated address details, as these are already included elsewhere in the decision. Main Issue 4. The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 5. The application site is located within a petrol filling station (PFS) on the south side of Stoke Road. Alongside the petrol filling facilities, the PFS includes a large forecourt, parking, an advertisement totem, a small shop and car wash facility. There is another click and collect locker adjacent to the side wall of the shop. The appeal site has a commercial appearance, which is typical of a petrol https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K3605/W/21/3271102 filling station. The surrounding area is mostly residential, with residential dwellings located immediately behind the PFS and a nursing home to its east. 6. The locker measures approximately 8m in width, 1m in depth and has a maximum height of approximately 2.4m. In terms of size and scale, it comfortably occupies the area of grass verge between the shop and car wash without appearing bulky or cramped. Due to its siting between the PFS shop and the car wash, the locker is largely obscured from view on the approach to the PFS from both easterly and westerly directions. It only becomes visible directly in front of the PFS. The locker is also sited in front of a boundary wall which separates the PFS from the residential development behind, and because it sits lower than this wall, it cannot be seen from these dwellings. Due to these factors, the visual impact of the locker is not significant. Even where the locker is visible from the public realm, the appearance of the InPost locker is commensurate with the commercial nature of the surrounding structures including both the shop and the car wash, which means it assimilates with the space without appearing incongruous or alien. 7.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision The exterior of the locker is mainly stainless-steel which is coloured pale pink. “InPost” branding appears across the front, which is relatively neutral in colour. These colours stood out no more than the tone of other colours used across the commercial signage of the petrol station, the car wash and the other click and collect facility (which is significantly brighter in tone), so did not strike me as garish. The colour palette is befitting of the locker’s commercial use, which makes it easily identifiable to customers. 8. The Council contends that the InPost locker creates visual clutter due to the existing blue locker which is already located on the site. The blue locker cannot be seen at all when entering the site at its western end, as it is hidden from view by the shop. Whilst it is more visible if approaching from the west, it assimilates well with the side of the forecourt shop, as it sits flush with the wall. Much like the InPost locker, its colour and branding are reflective of other signage and branding across the wider PFS, so it does not jar with its surroundings.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision The InPost locker sits perpendicular to the western wall of the shop on which the blue locker is located, which effectively creates a “corner” of click & collect facilities next to the shop. This arrangement optimises the space between the shop and the car wash, which would other be redundant, and given the size of this space, both lockers can be accommodated without appearing cramped or cluttered. 9. I agree with the appellant that the development provides certain benefits which help achieve certain sustainability objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), which all weigh in its favour. The locker allows goods for different customers to be delivered to a single location which helps reduce congestion on the road network. Its location encourages linked trips, as customers can utilise the click and collect facility at the same time as other services on the site. The click and collect facility also supports the longevity of the business operations of the wider appeal site. 10. In terms of appearance, the development is in-keeping with the commercial nature of the wider petrol filling station.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision It optimises space between other commercial structures without appearing bulky or cramped and has been designed using materials and colours which are consistent in tone with other structures and facilities on the site. For these reasons, I am satisfied that the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision It optimises space between other commercial structures without appearing bulky or cramped and has been designed using materials and colours which are consistent in tone with other structures and facilities on the site. For these reasons, I am satisfied that the https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 7 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/K3605/W/21/3271102 development would not harm the character and appearance of the area, and would therefore be consistent with policies DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan: Development Management Plan (2015) and policies CS10 and CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011). These policies require new development to preserve the character and appearance of the surrounding area through high quality and sustainable design, which demonstrates environment awareness and maximises the efficient use of urban land. The development is also consistent with the overarching objectives of the Framework in terms of design and sustainability. Other Matters 11. Part of the wider petrol filling station is located within the Tilt Conservation Area. Whilst the development is not within the conservation area, I have still considered its effect on the wider setting of the conservation area due to its proximity. As set out above, I consider that the appearance of the development is consistent with the commercial nature of surrounding structures within the petrol filling station, and therefore integrates with the street scene without harming the character or appearance of the nearby conservation area.

Page 3 · Chunk 8 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision This is consistent with the Council’s stance on the issue. 12. I note the Council’s comments that the development is located in an area which benefits from planning permission (granted on appeal) for an extension to the forecourt building. I have no evidence before me as to whether this development will be carried out, and so it does not weigh on my decision. 13. In terms of comments made by local residents, issues raised regarding the appearance of the scheme have been addressed in the commentary above. Concerns relating to enforcement of existing planning permissions are matters for the Council. In terms of any increase in footfall arising from the development, I agree with the Council that this can be accommodated on the site without causing harm to the amenity of nearby residents. As such, I am satisfied that none of these issues lead to a degree of harm which would justify dismissal of the appeal. Conditions 14. I have included standardised plans and materials conditions to ensure the development is retained as originally carried out. In terms of the materials condition, I have used “tailpiece” wording to give a degree of flexibility in case the external materials need to be changed or restored in future.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 Appeal Decision

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — Appeal Decision Conclusion 15. For the reasons set out above, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 James Blackwell

Beech Service Station, Stoke Road, COBHAM, KT11 3AS — Elmbridge Borough Council — James Blackwell INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶6

The locker's size and siting make it largely obscured from view, and its design is consistent with the commercial surroundings.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶7

The locker's exterior is designed to be consistent with the commercial signage of the petrol station, making it easily identifiable to customers.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The InPost locker and an existing blue locker create a 'corner' of click & collect facilities that optimises the space between the shop and car wash, and can be accommodated without appearing cramped or cluttered.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶12

The Council's comments regarding the development being located in an area with existing planning permission for an extension to the forecourt building do not weigh on the decision.

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶13

Concerns regarding enforcement of existing planning permissions and increase in footfall are addressed in the inspector's commentary.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan: Development Management Plan (2015) and policies CS10 and CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Str
Determinative
NPPF
Substantial

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 1 July 2021 under the Open Government Licence.