Case 3271044

Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland, Lydiate, L31 4HZ

West Lancashire District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
6 August 2021
Authority
West Lancashire District Council
Inspector
Williamson J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Outline
Development type
Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Appellant
Mr David Molyneux
Agent
NJSR Chartered Architects LLP
LPA reference
2021/0143/PNP
ONS LPA code
E07000127
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
5 May 2021

Summary AI

The inspector refused an award of costs to the applicant, as the council did not behave unreasonably in refusing the application. The applicant relied on case law that pre-dates a more recent Court of Appeal judgement, and the inspector considered the council's concerns regarding the use of the land and the proposed building to be legitimate.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland, Lydiate, L31 4HZ — West Lancashire District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 6 July 2021 by J Williamson BSc (Hons) MPlan MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 06 August 2021 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/P2365/W/21/3271044 Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Molyneux for an award of costs against West Lancashire Borough Council. • The appeal is against refusal of an application for determination as to whether prior approval is required for a proposed agricultural building to be used for the storage of agricultural machinery and equipment. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is refused. Procedural Matter 2. The applicant states on the application that he “claims his costs against the Council”. I understand this to mean that he is applying for a full award of costs. Notwithstanding, I have also considered whether a partial award would be justified. Reasons 3.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland, Lydiate, L31 4HZ — West Lancashire District Council — Costs Decision Irrespective of the outcome of an appeal, the National Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded where a party has behaved unreasonably, and the unreasonable behaviour has directly caused another party to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. Unreasonable behaviour may be procedural (relating to the process) or substantive (relating to the issues arising from the merits of the appeal). 4. The applicant considers an award of costs is justified due to the following “…in accordance with the National Planning Policy Guidance March 2014 for their unreasonable behaviour in acting contrary to established case law despite being provided with an up-to-date recent appeal decision. In addition, the Council misrepresented the appellant’s application.” 5. The PPG provides examples of the kinds of behaviour that may give rise to a substantive award of costs against a local planning authority, one of which is “acting contrary to, or not following, well-established case law”1. 1 PPG Paragraph: 047 Reference ID: 16-047-20140306; Revision date: 06 03 2014 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland, Lydiate, L31 4HZ — West Lancashire District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/J4423/W/21/3266383 6. I note that the case law the appellant draws upon in support of his proposal pre-dates the Court of Appeal judgement in the New World Payphones Ltd v Westminster City Council [2019] EWCA Civ 2250 case2, in which, among other things, it was judged that to fall within a specified class of Permitted Development (PD), development must comply with the class description and satisfy the limitations and conditions unique to that class. 7. In light of the more recent case law than that relied on by the appellant, I consider that the Council did not behave unreasonably in refusing the appellant’s application for the reasons it did so. I also consider that the Council had legitimate concerns regarding the use of the land and the proposed building the subjects of the appeal; as such, I do not consider that the Council misrepresented the appellant’s application. 8. I therefore conclude that it has not been demonstrated that the Council behaved unreasonably in respect of procedural or substantive matters associated with the determination of application Ref 2021/0143/PNP.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland, Lydiate, L31 4HZ — West Lancashire District Council — Costs Decision Consequently, there has not been any unreasonable behaviour which caused the applicant to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process, as described in the PPG. Therefore, an award of costs is not justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 J Williamson

Land Off Greens Lane, Downholland, Lydiate, L31 4HZ — West Lancashire District Council — J Williamson INSPECTOR 2 New World Payphones Ltd v Westminster City Council [2019] EWCA Civ 2250, published 18/12/19 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶8

The applicant's claim that the council misrepresented the application is unfounded, as the inspector considers the council's concerns regarding the use of the land and the proposed building to be legitimate.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶7

The council did not behave unreasonably in refusing the application, as they had legitimate concerns regarding the use of the land and the proposed building.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
PPG 047
Unclear

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 6 August 2021 under the Open Government Licence.