Case 3270765

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS

Vale of White Horse District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
8 September 2021
Authority
Vale of White Horse District Council
Inspector
Longmuir J
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Siriwat Pinsiranon
Agent
Mike Gilbert Planning Ltd
LPA reference
P20/V3257/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000180
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
4 June 2021

Summary AI

The appeal for a replacement dwelling and additional dwelling on a corner site in Harcourt Hill, Oxford, was dismissed due to harm to the character and appearance of the area. The proposed development would be out of context, too close to the road, and would compromise the spatial relationship between buildings and the road.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 3 August 2021 by J P Longmuir BA(Hons) DipUD MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 8 September 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/V3120/W/21/3270765 Gateways, Harcourt Hill, Oxford, OX2 9AS • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Siriwat Pinsiranon against the decision of Vale of White Horse District Council. • The application Ref P20/V3257/FUL, dated 11 December 2020, was refused by notice dated 16 February 2021. • The development proposed is replace existing dwelling and erect additional dwelling and garage in the rear garden. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) was published on 20 July 2021 after the submission of the appeal statements. Both parties were given the opportunity to comment on its changed significance or otherwise. 3. The appeal site has been the subject of a previous appeal1 for its subdivision to create an additional dwelling to the rear. This was dismissed on grounds of harm to character and appearance, on 1 October 2020. I have therefore given this consideration.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision Main Issue 4. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 5. Harcourt Hill lies on the outskirts of Oxford. It is a steep hillside with detached houses on one side set within large verdant gardens and Oxford Brookes campus on the other. 6. The previous Inspector noted the pattern of development on Harcourt Hill being well-defined, with houses set well back from the highway behind a strong building line. He also noted the rectilinear plots are generously proportioned with deep rear gardens combining to provide a sense of spaciousness and 1 APP/V3120/W/20/3253915 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision Main Issue 4. The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area. Reasons 5. Harcourt Hill lies on the outskirts of Oxford. It is a steep hillside with detached houses on one side set within large verdant gardens and Oxford Brookes campus on the other. 6. The previous Inspector noted the pattern of development on Harcourt Hill being well-defined, with houses set well back from the highway behind a strong building line. He also noted the rectilinear plots are generously proportioned with deep rear gardens combining to provide a sense of spaciousness and 1 APP/V3120/W/20/3253915 https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V3120/W/21/3270765 tranquillity. The houses take up a small percentage of their curtilage and there is a significant amount of greenery between buildings and the road. 7. The appeal site includes a 1960s style two storey dwelling, sited towards the Harcourt Road frontage. It has buff brick walling which matches that in the campus buildings opposite. 8. The appeal site is on a corner formed by the junction of Harcourt Hill with its offshoot Stanton Road. The appeal site includes rough grassland which extends substantially to the rear alongside the Stanton Road frontage. 9. The proposal involves the demolition of the existing house and its replacement on a similar siting but substantially wider and taller at two and a half storeys. It would have a formal classical detailed front elevation which together with a significantly forward projecting gable would have an impression of grandeur. 10. However, the front of the appeal site would not be sufficiently large to provide the space and grounds to offset the scale and detailing of this dwelling, so that it would appear cramped.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision Furthermore, it would appear out of context and too close to the road within a frontage dominated by parking, rather than being in an appropriate formal setting. 11. The frontage would also include an access to the proposed house behind. The access would be immediately alongside this formal house and would again look out of keeping. 12. The fenestration of the front elevation is reflective of the classical style which is also emulated by hipped ends, front gable and entrance porch. However, at one side of this elevation is a garage door. This breaks up the asymmetry of the elevation and also looks overtly utilitarian. 13. The front roofslope includes a dormer window which would be one of the widest windows on the elevation and of considerable length. This would not appear as subservient and attract undue attention away from the rest of the elevation, competing inappropriately with other elements such as the entrance. 14. The proposal involves a second house to the rear. The previous Inspector concluded that sub-division of the garden would not be in keeping with the nature of the other residential plots. I do not disagree.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision I acknowledge that the proposed house would be smaller, however the Inspector’s conclusion in part points to the principle of development. 15. The proposed house to the rear would be designed as an unassuming one and half storey dwelling. However, it would have a central offshoot gable with substantial offset fenestration. This would look at odds with the rest of the building and spoil its coherency. 16. I therefore conclude that the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area. 17. Core Policy CP37 of the Vale of White Horse Local Plan requires development to respond positively to the site and its surroundings and visually integrate with its surroundings. The Vale of White Horse Design Guide provides criteria to appreciate a site’s character and context and how to respond accordingly. Policy HS1 of the North Hinksey Neighbourhood Plan requires that new housing follows the pattern of the surroundings. Paragraph 126 of the National Planning https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 6 Appeal Decision

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/V3120/W/21/3270765 Policy Framework requires the creation of high quality, beautiful and sustainable buildings and places. Paragraph 130 requires that development is sympathetic to local character. The proposal would be contrary to the above policy and guidance. Other matters 18. I am aware of the concerns from local residents about the privacy, however I consider that direct overlooking would not be likely, and the garden areas would be sufficiently segregated. I also note concerns about highway impact, but this is a cul-de-sac with yellow lines and traffic speeds should be low. The concerns of biodiversity and the impacts on landscaping would have to be addressed by details but in any event, I am not so minded. There is also concern about ownership of some of the site but that would be a matter between those parties rather than a consideration here. 19. The proposal would result in an additional dwelling which would help housing land supply and have social and economic benefits. However, these would be limited and would not outweigh the impacts. Conclusion 20. I therefore conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Page 3 · Chunk 7 John Longmuir

Gateways Harcourt Hill, OXFORD, OX2 9AS — Vale of White Horse District Council — John Longmuir INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶10

The proposed dwelling would appear cramped and out of context due to its grandeur and forward projecting gable.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶12

The garage door on the front elevation breaks up the asymmetry and looks overtly utilitarian.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶13

The dormer window on the front roofslope would attract undue attention and compete with other elements on the elevation.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶15

The proposed house to the rear would have a central offshoot gable and substantial offset fenestration, spoiling its coherency.

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶16

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶17

The proposal would be contrary to Core Policy CP37 of the Vale of White Horse Local Plan and Policy HS1 of the North Hinksey Neighbourhood Plan.

Other
Against appellant
¶18

I am aware of concerns about privacy, highway impact, biodiversity, and landscaping, but these are not the main issues.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
CP37
Determinative
HS1
Determinative
NPPF 130
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 3 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 September 2021 under the Open Government Licence.