Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD
London Borough of Croydon — appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Authority
- London Borough of Croydon
- Inspector
- Wood T
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Development type
- Minor offices/R&D/light industry
- Appellant
- Mr N Siddiqui
- Agent
- PD Planning UK Ltd
- LPA reference
- 19/05788/FUL
- ONS LPA code
- E09000008
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
- Start date
- 15 July 2021
Summary AI
The appeal was dismissed due to the proposed development's impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. The inspector considered that the additional storeys would be visually intrusive and dominate the area. The public benefits of the proposal, including additional office space and improved appearance, were insufficient to outweigh the harm.
PDF text
Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD — London Borough of Croydon — Appeal Decision Site visit made on 6 September 2021 by Tim Wood BA(Hons) BTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 8th December 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/L5240/W/21/3269575 Saffron House, 15 Park Street, Croydon CR0 1YD • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr N Siddiqui against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Croydon. • The application Ref 19/05788/FUL, dated 9 December 2019, was refused by notice dated 20 November 2020. • The development proposed is alterations, erection of two additional storeys facing onto Park Street and one additional storey facing onto George Street with link walkway to accommodate office space. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue in this appeal is the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the conservation area. Reasons 3. This existing office/commercial building has a frontage onto George Street and also onto Park Street. The George Street frontage is of 3 storeys in height and faces onto a primarily retail/commercial street. The Park Street element is of 4 storeys.
Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD — London Borough of Croydon — Appeal Decision The appeal site is within the Central Croydon Conservation Area. The building is identified within the Conservation Area Appraisal as making a neutral contribution to the area. 4. The conservation area boundary runs along Park Street such that the northern side, including the appeal site, is within the conservation area and the southern side is not. From within Park Street, the existing building is readily visible, particularly from the west where, due to the configuration and size of neighbouring buildings, the side and front of the building are exposed. Within the conservation area, buildings to the west here are lower than the appeal building and those to the east vary in size, the nearest being lower than Saffron House and others being a similar height. 5. The proposed extension to the Park Street section would add 2 storeys with virtually no set-back from the existing elevations. Due to the prominence of the building within the conservation area here, I consider that this would have a considerable visual impact. It would result in the building being the tallest https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate
Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD — London Borough of Croydon — Appeal Decision Appeal Decision APP/L5240/W/21/3269575 here within the conservation area and I consider that it would appear unduly prominent and dominating, compared to other buildings on this side of the road. I acknowledge that redevelopment of the site on the opposite side of the road results in a much bigger structure; however, this is outside the conservation area and different considerations apply to sites within a conservation area. The presence of the larger structure outside the area does not compel me to look favourably on the effects of the appeal scheme within the conservation area, where the buildings are of a different scale and appearance. 6. Within George Street, the proposal would be set back by 4m from the building frontage and would be of 1 additional floor. George Street is relatively narrow and the buildings either side of the appeal site are of roughly the same height. The combination of the proposed set-back and the restricted views available of the upper parts of the buildings would mean that very little, if anything at all, of the proposal would be visible from the street level here.
Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD — London Borough of Croydon — Appeal Decision Taking account of the existence of other upper level elements to other buildings here, I consider that the proposal would have no unacceptable effects on the George Street frontage. In relation to the Designated View, this relates to the view along George Street from west to east culminating in the tower block known as No 1 Croydon. For the reasons stated above, I consider that there would be very little likelihood of seeing the extensions within this context and even if it were to be seen, it would be a very small element of it and within the context of a varied roof-scape. As a consequence, I consider that the Designated View would not be affected by the proposal. Balance and Conclusions 7. The Council include within the reason for refusal reference to the absence of a facility for refuse storage. In the event that the appeal had been successful, I consider that this matter could have been suitably dealt with by means of a condition. 8. The proposal would bring about additional and refurbished offices within this central location, which is a benefit of the proposal. The proposal would also lead to the removal from view of the mechanical plant at the roof level of the existing building.
Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD — London Borough of Croydon — Appeal Decision This must be balanced against the failure of the proposal to either preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area, which I assess to amount to ‘less than substantial’ harm. In my consideration these public benefits are insufficient to outweigh the harm that I have identified. As a consequence, I conclude that the proposal conflicts with Policies DM10 and DM 18 of the Croydon Local Plan. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Saffron House, 15 Park Street, CROYDON, CR0 1YD — London Borough of Croydon — S T Wood INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2
Main issues and findings
Heritage impact Against appellant ¶5
The proposed extension would have a considerable visual impact, making the building the tallest in the conservation area and appearing unduly prominent and dominating.
Living conditions Neutral ¶7
The absence of a facility for refuse storage could be dealt with by a condition, and the proposal would bring additional and refurbished offices to the area.
Policies relied on
| Reference | Weight |
|---|---|
| Croydon Local Plan DM10 and DM18 |
Determinative |
Site constraints from the Casework Database
Source
Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 8 December 2021 under the Open Government Licence.