Case 3268073

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW

Dorset — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
30 September 2021
Authority
Dorset
Inspector
Bale M
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Other minor developments
Appellant
Mr Ray Gerson
Agent
Ian C. Speirs & Associates
LPA reference
3/20/0820/FUL
ONS LPA code
E06000059
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
19 July 2021

Summary AI

The appeal for planning permission to construct 3 dormer windows and extend an existing rear dormer was dismissed due to concerns over the visual impact on the character and appearance of the area.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Appeal Decision

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW — Dorset — Appeal Decision Site Visit made on 15 September 2021 by M Bale BA (Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 30 September 2021 Appeal Ref: APP/D1265/W/21/3268073 30 Moorlands Road, West Moors BH22 0JW • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a failure to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an application for planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mr Ray Gerson against Dorset Council. • The application, Ref. 3/20/0820/FUL, is dated 20 May 2020. • The development proposed is to construct 3 dormer windows only on front elevation and extend existing rear dormer over existing single storey ground floor extension. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed and planning permission to construct 3 dormer windows only on front elevation and extend existing rear dormer over existing single storey ground floor extension is refused. Background and Main Issue 2. Although concerns about various matters have been raised in the representations, the Council has confirmed that the application would have been refused on the basis that the roof alterations resulted in a harmful visual impact.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Appeal Decision

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW — Dorset — Appeal Decision An officer report confirms that the concern relates to three proposed front dormer windows. 3. A tick box section of the officer report is somewhat confusing in that, in places, it appears to contradict the written analysis below it. However, read alongside the stated reasons that permission would have been refused, the alleged harm is clear. 4. Therefore, the main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, with regard to the proposed front dormer windows. Reasons 5. Moorlands Road is a long, straight road lined with mainly individual dwellings. Strong tree and hedge front boundaries screen many of the dwellings such that only the upper floors are readily visible. There are numerous dormer windows along the road, but they are generally positioned so as to be clearly subservient to the roof forms, well-proportioned and positioned in relation to the main parts of the dwellings. 6. The site is unusually prominent in having no front boundary treatment. While not dissimilar in scale to one of its immediate neighbours, it is also relatively short compared to most nearby buildings. A single triangular gable with circular window projects from the lower parts of the front roof slope.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Appeal Decision

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW — Dorset — Appeal Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Appeal Decision

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW — Dorset — Appeal Decision https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate Appeal Decision APP/D1265/W/21/3268073 7. The proposal would not be incompatible in height and scale with the generally larger buildings around it. However, it would introduce 3 new dormer windows higher on the roof than the existing gable, close to the ridge. Their height and number would not be subservient to the gable and would result in a top-heavy appearance to this relatively small building. 8. Moreover, the dormer positioning, close to but higher than the existing front gable, would result in a clumsy arrangement of different architectural features within a single, small building. The effect would be an awkward, cluttered roofscape that was readily visible amongst other, generally well-proportioned and individually cohesive, buildings. It would appear incongruous in the Moorlands Road street scene and harm the character and appearance of the area. 9. I, therefore, find conflict with Policy HE2 of the Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Part 1 – Core Strategy 2014, which aims to achieve development that is compatible with or improves its surroundings. Other Matters 10. I understand that the proposal would allow greater headroom within the roof space.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Appeal Decision

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW — Dorset — Appeal Decision However, there is little substantive evidence as to why that is required or how it would lead to better facilities at the site. I, therefore, give this little weight. Conclusion 11. For the reasons given, the appeal is dismissed.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 M Bale

30 Moorlands Road, West Moors, FERNDOWN, BH22 0JW — Dorset — M Bale INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Character and appearance
Against appellant
¶8

The introduction of 3 new dormer windows higher on the roof than the existing gable would result in a top-heavy appearance and a clumsy arrangement of architectural features.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Policy HE2 of the Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Part 1 – Core Strategy 2014
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 30 September 2021 under the Open Government Licence.