Case 3267452

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT

London Borough of Barnet — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
1 December 2021
Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Inspector
Senior H
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mrs Esther Gurvits
Agent
PPMS
LPA reference
20/2628/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000003
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
13 April 2021

Summary AI

The appeal was dismissed due to significant harm to the living conditions of future occupiers of the studio apartment, specifically regarding privacy. The proposal would also have a neutral effect on the supply of family housing in the locality.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Decision by R C Kirby BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — Decision by R C Kirby BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 01 December 2021

Page 1 · Chunk 1 46 Hurstwood Road, London, NW11 0AT

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — 46 Hurstwood Road, London, NW11 0AT • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Mrs Esther Gurvits against the decision of London Borough of Barnet. • The application Ref 20/2628/FUL, dated 13 May 2020, was refused by notice dated 18 November 2020. • The development proposed is “Part single, part two-storey rear extension. Single storey side extension following demolition of existing single storey granny annexe to side elevation. Creation of four flats at No.46 Hurstwood Road. Extension of existing basement. First storey side ext. Extension to roof including 1no rear dormer and 1no side dormer with 3no rooflights to front elevation and 1no rooflight to rear elevation following removal of 2no existing chimneys (1no shared) to No. 46 Hurtswood Road. Creation of basement level habitable space. First floor side and rear extensions. Extension to roof including 1no rear dormer and 1no side dormer with 3no rooflights to front elevation and 1no rooflight to rear elevation following removal of existing rear dormer and (part of) shared chimney to 48 Hurtswood Road. Associated alterations to fenestration and landscaping to both properties.”

Page 1 · Chunk 2 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/21/3267452 5. On my visit I observed that work was commencing on extensions to the properties and that they appeared not to be occupied at that time. Main Issues 6. Planning permission has previously been granted for the extensions to both properties. The Council has raised no concerns with this aspect of the proposal, and on the basis of the evidence before me I have no reason to find differently in this regard. 7. The main issues are therefore the effect of the use of No 46 as four flats (including studio apartment) on: • the character of the area with particular regard to the effect on the supply of family housing, • highway safety with particular regard to parking, and • the living conditions of future occupiers of the studio apartment with particular regard to privacy. Reasons for the Recommendation Character 8. Amongst other matters and to protect Barnett’s character and amenity Policy DM01 of Barnet’s Local Plan (Development Management Policies) Development Plan Document sets out that the conversion of dwellings into flats in roads characterised by houses will not normally be appropriate and that loss of houses in roads characterised by houses will not normally be appropriate. 9.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. The guidance in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Document: Residential Design Guide sets out that the conversion of existing dwellings into flats can have a cumulative effect in damaging the quality of the environment and the character of established residential areas. It establishes that conversions may be appropriate in certain types of property or street particularly where they are highly accessible but recognises that in such areas that such development may harm the character of areas by changing external appearance and increasing activity, including more people movements, increased car movements and parking stress, more rubbish to be collected and more deliveries. 10. Hurstwood Road is residential in character with semi-detached dwellings set behind small front gardens and parking areas; many of which have been extended. Whilst private dwellings are the predominant form of property in Hurstwood Road, there are a number of properties that have been converted to flats and there is a flatted development on the corner of Hurstwood Road with Finchley Road. There is no evidence before me to demonstrate that such uses have had a harmful effect upon the character and appearance of the locality.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Furthermore, at No 46, there were 2 residential units; the 2 storey dwelling and the former annexe to the side which had a lawful separate residential use. 11. The proposal includes No 46 being converted into 3 flats, a one bedroom flat at both lower ground floor and loft level, and a two bedroom flat at first floor level. The separate residential unit to the side would be a studio flat. Part of the ground floor would be used as extended living accommodation for No 48. The appeal site is within an accessible location, in close proximity to Finchley Road where there is a range of shops and services, as well as a number of bus https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 2 · Chunk 7 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Furthermore, at No 46, there were 2 residential units; the 2 storey dwelling and the former annexe to the side which had a lawful separate residential use. 11. The proposal includes No 46 being converted into 3 flats, a one bedroom flat at both lower ground floor and loft level, and a two bedroom flat at first floor level. The separate residential unit to the side would be a studio flat. Part of the ground floor would be used as extended living accommodation for No 48. The appeal site is within an accessible location, in close proximity to Finchley Road where there is a range of shops and services, as well as a number of bus https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Page 3 · Chunk 8 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/21/3267452 stops. The intended future occupiers of the new flats would be able to walk or cycle to these services and facilities. 12. Both properties would retain their appearance as a dwelling and whilst there would be likely to be more refuse bins associated with the proposed use at No 46, which could draw attention to the number of units within the property, this would, subject to suitable refuse storage areas, only be apparent on refuse collection days. The bins would therefore be unlikely to detract from the character and appearance of the area. 13. Furthermore, whilst noting the Council’s concerns in respect of the levels of activity and noise associated with the proposed use, I find that this would be unlikely to be dissimilar to that associated with a large family dwelling, particularly if there were teenagers, younger and older adults living together, where there could be coming and goings on foot and by car at different times of the day and evening associated with employment and social activities, as well as deliveries to the property. 14.

Page 3 · Chunk 9 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Although the Council has indicated that there is a demand for large dwellinghouses, I am not persuaded on the evidence before me that the loss of the 3 bedroom dwelling in its unextended form at No 46 would have a harmful effect on the supply of such dwellings. Furthermore, whilst having fewer bedrooms than the host property, there would be a high probability that the two bedroom flat would be occupied by a small family and as a consequence the proposal would have a neutral effect on the supply of family housing in the locality. Moreover, the provision of smaller units would provide a mix of housing products in the locality which would provide choice for all households and enable residents to progress on a housing journey that meets the aspirations of home ownership. 15. Given the above I conclude that the proposal would respect the character and appearance of the area in accordance with the aims of Policies CS4 and CS5 of the Barnet Core Strategy (2012), Policies DM01 and DM08 of the Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the Adopted Residential Design Guidance SPD9 (2016) (SPD) which together seek to ensure that development protects the character of the area and provides a range of dwelling sizes and types.

Page 3 · Chunk 10 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Highway safety 16. The submitted drawings indicate that 3 car parking spaces would be provided to the front of both No 46 and 48, whilst allowing space between the vehicles to provide access to the front doors of the respective properties. This would exceed the Council’s standards, with reference being made to a requirement of 5 spaces, including 2 spaces for the dwelling at No 48. 17. Whilst cars would be parked close to the windows of the respective properties, there would be space for pedestrians to walk past the cars into each of the properties and also space to wheel bins to the pavement on refuse collection days. 18. The appellant has indicated that the parking spaces would be served by 3 crossovers with space between each to comply with the Council’s standards. Whilst noting that the Council consider that their width would exceed that normally found to be acceptable by the highway authority, I have not been directed to its standards in this regard. Accordingly, from the evidence before https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 3

Page 4 · Chunk 11 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/21/3267452 me I am satisfied that suitable access to the spaces could be provided from the public highway and as a consequence there would be no conflict with Policies CS9 and CS15 of the Barnet Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM17 of the Development Management Policies DPD (2012) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) SPD which together seek to ensure that development takes into account the safety of all road users. 19. The Council has referred to the Planning Obligations SPD, which is not relevant in this case. Living conditions 20. The studio flat has its main entrances onto the narrow passageway to the side of this property, as well a window serving the living/sleeping space. 21. In order to access the rear garden of No 46 the intended future occupiers of the proposed flats would be likely to use the narrow passageway to the side of the new studio flat, in very close proximity to these doors and window. As a consequence there would be a high probability that the occupiers of the studio flat would have low levels of privacy within the property, with users of the passageway having direct views into the flat.

Page 4 · Chunk 12 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. A poor standard of living accommodation would be provided for the intended occupiers of this unit. 22. Whilst I acknowledge that the studio apartment to the side of No 46 already exists, there would be a high probability that there would be more comings and goings along the passageway compared to the existing situation, as a result of the building being occupied by more households than the current use. The likelihood of the privacy of the occupiers being invaded would therefore be greater. 23. I note that appellant has suggested that amendments could be made to the internal layout of the studio apartment to reduce privacy issues. However, amended plans are not before me and in any event, I can only determine the scheme on the basis of the plans submitted to and taken into consideration by the Local Planning Authority. 24. I therefore conclude that the proposal would result in significant harm to the living conditions of future occupiers of the studio apartment with particular regard to privacy, in conflict with Policies DM01 and DM02 of the Development Management Policies DPD (2012) which together seek to ensure that development is designed, amongst other matters, to allow adequate privacy for potential occupiers.

Page 4 · Chunk 13 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. It would also conflict with guidance in the Sustainable Design and Construction SPD (2016) and the Residential Design Guidance SPD (2016) which also requires that development does not result in a loss of privacy. Other Matters 25. Whilst I note the concern in respect of cycle storage areas and refuse storage, there would be space to provide such facilities to the rear or side of No 48 in respect of that property’s needs and to the rear of No 46, matters which could be controlled by planning condition. 26. I have had full regard to the personal circumstances that have given rise to the need for the proposal. Whilst I am sympathetic to this need as there is no mechanism available to me to ensure that the property would be occupied by https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 4

Page 5 · Chunk 14 appeal on this basis.

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — appeal on this basis. Appeal Decision APP/N5090/W/21/3267452 extended family members, I do not consider that it outweighs the harm I have identified. 27. My attention has been drawn to other appeal decisions for similar proposals. Whilst the proposals appear to be similar to the case before me, matters such as privacy were not in dispute and in this regard, and given my findings above, they are not directly comparable. I have considered this appeal on its own merits based on the site-specific circumstances of the case. Conclusion and Recommendation 28. The proposed development conflicts with the development plan as a whole and there are no other considerations, including the Framework, that outweigh this conflict. I therefore recommend that the appeal is dismissed.

Page 5 · Chunk 15 Hilary Senior

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — Hilary Senior APPEAL PLANNING OFFICER Inspector’s Decision 29. I have considered all the submitted evidence and the Appeal Planning Officer’s report and on that basis the appeal is dismissed.

Page 5 · Chunk 16 R C Kirby

46 - 48 Hurstwood Road, LONDON, NW11 0AT — London Borough of Barnet — R C Kirby INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 5

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Living conditions
Against appellant
¶21

The studio flat has its main entrances onto the narrow passageway to the side of this property, as well a window serving the living/sleeping space. The intended future occupiers of the proposed flats would be likely to use the narrow passageway to the side of the new studio flat, in very close proximity to these doors and window.

Character and appearance
For appellant
¶12

The proposal includes No 46 being converted into 3 flats, a one bedroom flat at both lower ground floor and loft level, and a two bedroom flat at first floor level. The separate residential unit to the side would be a studio flat. Part of the ground floor would be used as extended living accommodation for No 48.

Highway safety
For appellant
¶17

The submitted drawings indicate that 3 car parking spaces would be provided to the front of both No 46 and 48, whilst allowing space between the vehicles to provide access to the front doors of the respective properties.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
DM01
Determinative
DM08
Substantial
DM17
Substantial
CS4
Moderate
CS5
Moderate
CS9
Moderate
CS15
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 5 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 1 December 2021 under the Open Government Licence.