Case 3264407

Land behind The Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, MK42 9BA

Uttlesford District Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
12 July 2021
Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Inspector
Wilkinson S
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Development type
Major dwellings
Appellant
Barkby Real Estate Limited
Agent
Phillips Planning Services Limited
LPA reference
UTT/20/0864/FUL
ONS LPA code
E07000077
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
1 February 2021

Summary AI

The inspector allowed the costs application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, as the Council behaved unreasonably in relation to the viability study. The decision was based on the Planning Practice Guidance and the inspector's notes on the Council's recommendations and the viability report.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

Land behind The Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, MK42 9BA — Uttlesford District Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 24 March 2021 by Stephen Wilkinson BA (Hons) BPl DIP LA MBA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 13 May 2021 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/C1570/W/20/3264407 Land behind, the Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Barkby Real Estate Limited for a full award of costs against Uttlesford District Council. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for the erection of 35 dwelling houses. Decision 1. The application is allowed for a full award of costs in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. The appellants case is for a full award and is based on both procedural and substantive grounds. In summary it covers the following points: • The submission of a viability study with the application is in line with both adopted local policy and Planning Practice Guidance (the Guidance). The viability study’s evidence base, method and conclusions were agreed by the Council’s appointed consultants. This included the date of the baseline valuation.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

Land behind The Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, MK42 9BA — Uttlesford District Council — Costs Decision In turn the viability evidence was endorsed by officers. • No counter evidence or clear reason was provided by the Council when this matter was heard by the Committee and the decision made. It was incorrect to state that insufficient information had been included in the report. 3. For the above reasons, the Council behaved unreasonably resulting in the applicant incurring unnecessary expense. 4. The Council has not responded to the application for costs. Conclusions 5. Planning Practice Guidance (the Guidance) advises that costs may only be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expenses in the process. 6. In this case I have noted the recommendations of the Council officers in the report to Committee. Whilst a planning decision is a matter of judgement and the Committee was entitled not to accept officer’s professional advice this should only be made if a sound case could be made for a contrary view. https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

Land behind The Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, MK42 9BA — Uttlesford District Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/C1570/W/20/3264407 7. This was not the case in respect of this application. Sufficient evidence was included in the viability report to demonstrate why the scheme included an amount of affordable homes which did not accord with adopted policy. Conclusions 8. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour by the Council, resulting in unnecessary and wasted expense of the type I have identified above and as described by the Guidance has been demonstrated in respect of the issue of viability. Costs Order 9. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Uttlesford District Council shall pay to Barkby Real Estate Limited, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in paragraph 8 above. 10. The applicant is now invited to submit to Uttlesford District Council, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

Land behind The Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, MK42 9BA — Uttlesford District Council — Costs Decision In the event that the parties cannot agree on the amount, a copy of the note on how to apply for a detailed assessment by the Senior Courts Costs office is enclosed.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Stephen Wilkinson

Land behind The Old Cement Works, Thaxted Road, Saffron Walden, Essex, MK42 9BA — Uttlesford District Council — Stephen Wilkinson INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Housing land supply
Against appellant
¶2-4

The Council behaved unreasonably by not accepting the viability study's evidence and causing the applicant to incur unnecessary expense.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Planning Practice Guidance
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 12 July 2021 under the Open Government Licence.