Case 3253291

171 Ivyhouse Road, DAGENHAM, RM9 5RR

London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council — appeal allowed

Outcome
Allowed
Decision date
28 September 2021
Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Inspector
Pipe C
Procedure
Written Representations
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Unknown
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appellant
Mr Mohamed Bharadia
LPA reference
20/00324/FUL
ONS LPA code
E09000002
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
8 July 2020

Summary AI

The applicant's costs application was allowed due to unreasonable behaviour by the council. The council failed to provide sufficient grounds for refusing planning permission and did not adequately control the skylights.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decision

171 Ivyhouse Road, DAGENHAM, RM9 5RR — London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council — Costs Decision Site visit made on 8 June 2021 by Mrs Chris Pipe BA(Hons), DipTP, MTP, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 28 September 2021 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/Z5060/W/20/3253291 171 Ivyhouse Road, Dagenham RM9 5RR • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Bharadia for a full award of costs against the Council of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham. • The appeal was against the refusal of planning permission for conversion of existing 2 bed dwelling into 2 x 1bed apartments by means of single storey rear extension and loft conversion with rear dormer. Decision 1. The application for an award of costs is allowed in the terms set out below. Reasons 2. Planning Practice Guidance advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. 3. A full award of costs is sought by the applicant on both procedural and substantive basis. 4.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decision

171 Ivyhouse Road, DAGENHAM, RM9 5RR — London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council — Costs Decision Planning Practice Guidance indicates that local planning authorities will be at risk of an award being made against them if they fail to produce evidence to substantiate each reason for refusal. 5. It will be seen from my decision that there were not sufficient grounds for refusing planning permission relating to the loss of family housing, and that the details of the skylight/rooflight could have been controlled by planning condition. 6. There is a disagreement between parties as to the loss of a family dwelling, reason for refusal No. 1. I agree with the Appellant that there has been no loss of a family house given the existing floor plans demonstrate that the existing property is a 2 bedroom dwelling. Policy BC4 seeks to preserve and increase the stock of family housing, specifically referring to resisting proposals which involve the loss of housing with three bedrooms or more. The appeal site is a 2 bedroom property it is therefore difficult to substantiate the reasons for refusal No. 1. 7. In relation to the skylights outlined in reason for refusal No. 2 the Council have not provided substantive reasoning why this matter could not be controlled by https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 2 Costs Decision

171 Ivyhouse Road, DAGENHAM, RM9 5RR — London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council — Costs Decision Costs Decision APP/Z5060/W/20/3253291 the imposition of a planning condition. During my site visit I observed that skylights/rooflights are not an alien feature in the area. The opening mechanism is something which could be controlled by the imposition of a planning condition. 8. I therefore find that unreasonable behaviour resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense, as described in the Planning Practice Guidance, has been demonstrated, in this case having to prepare a case in relation to the reasons for refusal and that a full award of costs is justified. Costs Order 9. In exercise of the powers under section 250(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 and Schedule 6 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended, and all other enabling powers in that behalf, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Council of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham shall pay to Mr Bharadia, the costs of the appeal proceedings described in the heading of this decision limited to those costs incurred in responding to reasons for refusal; such costs to be assessed in the Senior Courts Costs Office if not agreed. 10.

Page 2 · Chunk 3 Costs Decision

171 Ivyhouse Road, DAGENHAM, RM9 5RR — London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council — Costs Decision The applicant is now invited to submit to the Council of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, to whom a copy of this decision has been sent, details of those costs with a view to reaching agreement as to the amount.

Page 2 · Chunk 4 C Pipe

171 Ivyhouse Road, DAGENHAM, RM9 5RR — London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council — C Pipe INSPECTOR https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Flood risk
Against appellant
¶7

The council failed to provide substantive reasoning for controlling the skylights, which could have been achieved through a planning condition.

Green belt
Against appellant
¶6

The appeal site is a 2 bedroom property, which does not meet the policy for preserving and increasing family housing.

Character and appearance
Neutral
¶8

The inspector noted that skylights/rooflights are not an alien feature in the area, but could be controlled by a planning condition.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
BC4
Determinative

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 28 September 2021 under the Open Government Licence.