Case 3245884

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH

Wychavon District Council — appeal dismissed

Outcome
Dismissed
Decision date
4 May 2022
Authority
Wychavon District Council
Inspector
Johnson W
Procedure
Hearing
Casework type
Planning Appeal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Other
Development type
Major traveller and caravan pitches
Appellant
Mr Hubert O'Doherty
Agent
Green Planning Studio Ltd
LPA reference
18/02270/CU
ONS LPA code
E07000238
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked
Start date
29 April 2020

Summary AI

The applicant's costs application was dismissed as it was not demonstrated that the Council's unreasonable behaviour caused unnecessary or wasted expense. The Council's delay in determining the application did not delay development that should have been permitted.

Generated from the decision letter — check against the original before relying on it.

PDF text

Page 1 · Chunk 0 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions Hearing Held on 1 March 2022 Site visit made on 1 March 2022 by Mr W Johnson BA(Hons) DipTP DipUDR MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 4 May 2022 Costs application in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/H1840/W/20/3245884 Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak to Crown Lane, Crossway Green DY13 9SH • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). • The application is made by Mr Hubert O’Doherty for a full award of costs against Wychavon District Council. • The hearing was in connection with an appeal against the failure of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for planning permission for the use of land for the stationing of caravans for residential purposes for 10 no. gypsy pitches, 1 site managers pitch together with the formation of additional hard standing and utility/dayrooms ancillary to that use, and the siting of 24 no. touring caravans for transit pitches for use by gypsy and travellers. Decision 1. The application for a full award of costs is refused. The submissions for Mr Hubert O’Doherty 2.

Page 1 · Chunk 1 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions A draft/skeleton costs application was emailed to the Planning Inspectorate before the Hearing on 25 February 2022, which was also copied to the Council. The applicant then expanded on the claim, orally at the Hearing. The applicant is seeking a full award of costs, but has stipulated that a partial award of costs should be awarded if the substantive claim is not justified based upon the unreasonable behaviour displayed by the Council. 3. The applicant considers that refusing to determine the application constitutes unreasonable behaviour and consequently forms the basis of the application. Furthermore, the applicant contends that the Council have continued to act unreasonably in defending the appeal when presented with their appeal submission, including his Appeal Statement and Updated Appeal Statement, which included a note from Counsel. It was advanced at the Hearing by the applicant that there was no merit in the Council’s approach. The response by Wychavon District Council 4. The Council responded verbally to the applicant’s grounds for an award of costs at the Hearing. The issue surrounding the failure to determine the application was not considered to be a trivial matter and was a complex one.

Page 1 · Chunk 2 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions The applicant was afforded the opportunity to revise the application, but declined. Whilst the applicant states the matter is obvious, the Hearing has been dominated by the technical matter surrounding whether or not the condition can be removed as https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 1 · Chunk 3 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions The applicant was afforded the opportunity to revise the application, but declined. Whilst the applicant states the matter is obvious, the Hearing has been dominated by the technical matter surrounding whether or not the condition can be removed as https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate

Page 2 · Chunk 4 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions Costs Decisions APP/H1840/W/20/3245884 requested. Consequently, the situation is not close to the basis of a costs application. Reasons 5. The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process. Costs may be awarded to any party regardless of the outcome of the appeal. The PPG makes it clear that a local planning authority is at risk of an award of costs if it behaves unreasonably with respect to the substance of the matter under appeal or with respect to procedural matters by preventing or delaying development which should clearly be permitted, having regard to its accordance with the development plan, national policy and any other material considerations. 6. The application was submitted to the Council on 18 October 2018 under section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the Act). The applicant appealed on the grounds of the Council’s failure to determine the application on 29 January 2020. It is not disputed that there was a failure by the Council to issue a decision within the statutory timeframe.

Page 2 · Chunk 5 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions However, the Council has given a judgment1 as a reason for its non-determination. It is also apparent that there was dialogue between the parties, in relation to the lack of progress of the application subject of this appeal. Whilst a solution surrounding the site plan submitted with the application was put forward by the Council, this was not accepted by the applicant given the refusal of the previous application2. 7. It will be seen from the decision in the appeal that I reached a similar conclusion to the Council with regard to whether or not the requested condition could be removed as requested. Having regard to this, even if the Council acted unreasonably by delaying determination, it did not delay development that should have been permitted having regard to the Act and other material considerations, particularly the findings in Finney. Therefore, the Council’s behaviour did not cause the applicant to incur wasted costs as an appeal was inevitable in any event. Conclusion 8. On the basis of the evidence before me, I conclude that it has not been demonstrated that the Council’s unreasonable behaviour caused unnecessary or wasted expense in so far as an award of costs could be justified.

Page 2 · Chunk 6 Costs Decisions

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — Costs Decisions I therefore determine that the costs application should fail and no award is made.

Page 2 · Chunk 7 W Johnson

Shorthill Caravan Park, A449 Mitre Oak To Crown Lane, Crossway Green, DY13 9SH — Wychavon District Council — W Johnson INSPECTOR 1 John Leslie Finney v Welsh Ministers, Carmarthenshire County Council, Energiekontor (UK) Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 1868 (Finney) 2 17/01008/COU https://www.gov.uk/planning-inspectorate 2

Extracted from the decision letter PDF and shown in full, chunk by chunk.

Main issues and findings

Planning obligations
For appellant
¶5

The applicant considers that refusing to determine the application constitutes unreasonable behaviour.

Planning obligations
Against appellant
¶7

Even if the Council acted unreasonably by delaying determination, it did not delay development that should have been permitted.

Policies relied on

Reference Weight
Planning Practice Guidance (PPG)
Moderate

Site constraints from the Casework Database

Conservation area
Green belt
Listed building setting
AONB
SSSI
Flooding an issue

Source

Decision letter, 2 pages, issued by the Planning Inspectorate on 4 May 2022 under the Open Government Licence.